According to PowerData, 84% of the electorate claim to meet Lula’s head of the economy; Minister was well rated by 24%in April 2023
The positive perception of the work of the Minister of Finance, (PT), has advanced 3 percentage points in 2 months among the 84% of voters who say they know who he is. In March, there were 29% those who said that the head of the economy performed “excellent”Or“bom”. Today, there are 32%. Data are research Power held from May 31 to June 2, 2025.
The percentage of those who evaluate Haddad as “roomy”Or“bad”It is 21%. Osted 4 percentage points down since May 2024, when it reached the highest level in the series. The minister’s work is considered“regular”By 34%. Another 13% could not answer.
The research was conducted by Powergroup company Poder360 Journalism, with its own resources. The data were collected from May 31 to June 2, 2025, through calls for mobile phones and fixed phones. In all, 2,500 interviews were conducted in 219 municipalities distributed through the 27 units of the Federation. The margin of error is 2 percentage points. The confidence interval is 95%.
To reach 2,500 interviews that fill proportionally (as they appear in society) groups by sex, age, income, education and geographical location, the Power It makes tens of thousands of phone calls. Often there are more than 100,000 calls until respondents are faithful who are faithful to the whole of the population. Learn more about the reading methodology .
STRATIFICATION
O Poder360 Stratifies data by sex, age, region, education, family income and religion. The minister’s assessment has few variations when analyzed by demographic cutouts, as shown in the infographic below:
Evaluation of Haddad x Voting in 2022
O Power crossed Haddad’s evaluation data with the interviewees’ vote declaration in the 2nd round of 2022. The minister, of course, is better evaluated in the group that voted for the president (PT): 38% say your work is “bom”Or“excellentAnd 18% declare to be “roomy”Or“bad”.
No group that affirms non-president voted (PL) In the 2nd round of the 2022 elections, the positive evaluation drops to 26%. Those who consider the command of the economy by the minister as “roomy”Or“bad”Add 26%.
O Power showed in this that Haddad has been able, unlike Lula, to pierce the bubble of the group that elected the petista in 2022. Thus, it is possible as possible successor to the petista to the Plateau.
84% know Haddad
It is the sum of voters who declare to know “good”(40%) or“of to hear to speak”(44%) Lula’s Minister of Economy. The rate has advanced 11 percentage points since April 2023, a few months after Lula’s inauguration.
O Poder360 Stratifies the data by demographic groups. This is the rate of knowledge of Haddad by sex, age, region, education, income and religion:
Power
The content of Power It can be read on social networks, where infographics and news are shared. Follow the profiles of the Research Division of the Poder360 no no no and no .
Read other reports of this round:
Research aggregator
O Poder360 It maintains a collection with thousands of surveys with known methodologies and on which it was possible to verify the origin of the information. There are studies conducted from the 2000 municipal elections. This is the largest and longest survey of electoral polls available on the Brazilian internet.
The database is interactive and allows you to track the evolution of each candidate. Access the research aggregator .
Research information began to be compiled by the journalist Director of Writing of Poder360on its website, in the year 2000. To access the old page with the surveys, .
METHODOLOGY
The research Power It was held from May 31 to June 2, 2025. 2,500 people were interviewed 16 years old or more in 218 municipalities in the 27 Federation units. A parametric consideration was applied to compensate for disproportionality in the variables of sex, age, degree of instruction, region and income. The error margin is 2 percentage points, more or less.
The interviews were conducted by telephone (for fixed and mobile lines), through the URA (audible response unit) system, where the interviewee hears recorded questions and responds through the keyboard of the device. The study’s confidence interval is 95%.
To facilitate reading, the research results were rounded.
Because of this process, it is possible that the sum of any of the results is different from 100. Differences between total frequencies and percentages in variable cross tables may appear due to non -response occurrences. This study was conducted with its own resources from the Powerresearch company that is part of the media group Power360 Journalism.
