It is recurring to hear in the corridors of Congress that today few deputies and senators have the courage to post a photo with the president (PT) on their social networks, given the current unpopularity of the petista, reinforced by series opinion polls.
This time, it was Quaest’s survey to point out that negative perception of management remains high, at a time when the government is turned with and, especially,.
Fear of losing voters makes even left -wing parliamentarians hesitate to publicize the covenant with the petista.
Three days ago, Lula in the presidency of and stated that if he remains “handsome”, the “far right does not go back to govern this country.” It was natural that, after attending the event, Lula had photos and videos published by the acronym parliamentarians on the networks, but they seemed to not agree with the self -ease.
Of the 15 federal deputies of the PSB, only 4 posted portraits or speech of the petista in recent weeks in their feeds. Of the 4 senators, 2 have not published images of the president for months.
If the binding to the government affects even the leftist congressmen, it is in centron that Lula’s unpopularity hits stronger: the invoice to approve in Congress the proposals of interest of the Planalto will be increasingly high, and the chances of support for reelection seem practically null.
MDB and PSD no longer hide that they are far from the “broad front” for reelection. Its leaders argue that only politicians in the Northeast region to this photo. In other states, the perception is that being with Lula’s side in reelection will take votes and that there is no reason to impose this wear when the priority is to strengthen the benches on the House and in.
In other center-right and right parties, hesitation is greater and causes unusual moments. In April, when Lula had dinner with party leaders, some politicians fled discreetly from the photographer’s lens not to appear on the meeting. Not even the protagonist of the book “Where’s Wally?” hid so well.
This Wednesday (4) research ends up reinforcing the lack of goodwill of the Centrão politicians with the petista within the congress. Lula’s data at its worst moment, with 43% negative assessment and only 26% positive. In March, it was 41% to 27%. The margin of error is two points.
Earlier this year, the reasons that led Lula to reach what the petistas expected to be the bottom of the well were high inflation and the. Now, the impression of the rise of food and fuel prices has fallen, which can even be celebrated by them, but the fraud against retirees and protests of businessmen against the new rise in taxes have kept wear on high level.
No, the Lula administration was unable to make the population believe in their strategy of blaming the Bolsonaro government and assuming the role of the evildoers, responsible for returning the piled money of the old men. For 31% of voters, it is fault of the current management. Only 8% attribute the paternity of fraud in discounts to the previous administration.
In the IOF crisis, the population is more inclined to support the actors who argue to overthrow the discharge of tax than to see merit in the government’s arguments that it is necessary to raise the collection to the public power again.
The survey shows that 50% of respondents consider the increase in tax an error, although only 39% were aware that this had occurred when they were questioned by the interviewers.
The lack of popular support to the initiative leaves the Planalto Palace and the delicate situation to negotiate compensatory measures that allow Lula to retreat from the discharge of tax while maintaining the expenditure level at the intended levels.
Most deputies and senators are not leftist-it is from center right or right. What does the petista have to offer them?
Traditional exchange coins no longer have the same effect as previous governments. Parliamentary amendments are almost all of payment required and in record volume. Positions in ministries and states are still serving to allocate political allies, but the folder’s own budget to deliver public policies is minimal.
The petista was left to offer the image of a popular government and president in exchange for parliamentary support. A year of election, there is no longer left.
