CRISTINA RODRIGUES, MP
“For now, I just say that I reject the facts that are imputed to me,” said the deputy of arrival, who did not want to lengthen.
The deputy of the arrival Cristina Rodrigues, to provoke a “Computer Blackout” of Pan’s ‘Emails’denied this Thursday, in the first session of the trial, the prosecution of the prosecutor for crimes of damage and illegitimate access.
After the defenses decided to do without the introductory exhibitions, the current deputy of the arrival said not wanting to speak At this stage of the trial, whose first session takes place this morning.
“For now, I just say that I reject the facts that are imputed to me”Sinced Cristina Rodrigues.
In the accusation order, deducted in 2022 and to which the Lusa agency had access, the prosecutor classified as “Very high” Cristina Rodrigues’ “unlawfulness”, although she has considered that a penalty of more than five years should not be applied, as she has no criminal record.
In addition to Cristina Rodrigues, this trial has another defendant, SARA FERNANDES, Former PAN employee, who is accused by the prosecutor of the crime of damage to programs or other computer data, in co-authorship with the current deputy of the arrival.
This former employee, from the legal area in the provision of services in PAN between 2016 and 2022, wanted to make statements in court, having also denied any involvement in the “computer background” and considered that this case It is “another political war between the party and the deputy who left”.
Sara Fernandes stressed that she was only aware of Cristina Rodrigues’ departure through social networks and that even after her departure from the party, she continued to work at Pan until she was a defendant.
At issue in this is a “computer blackout” in the ’emails’ of PAN leaders in 2020, when Cristina Rodrigues was still party deputy.
Cristina Rodrigues later passed the unfinished deputy, when she paraded PAN, and later ran on the arrival lists, a party for which she was elected deputy.
The Public Prosecution Service considered that “the defendants They acted deliberately, free and consciousaccording to a plano Previously traced, with the aim of prohibiting PAN’s access and its militants to the content of the party’s email messages.
“The defendants have removed from that message box thousands of email messages contained there, which they knew not to have authorization to do. They aimed at the defendants-and managed to-prevent the PAN party from continuing their political activity,” reads in the order.
