Magistrate Amilcar Roberto Bezerra Guimarães made statements that were considered inadequate, referring to an alleged “epidemic” of autism diagnoses and questioning the need for high values for the pension
A in the State of Pará is in the process of preparing a petition that will be sent to the National Council of Justice (CNJ). This action arises in response to comments made by Judge Amilcar Roberto Bezerra Guimarães during a trial related to the alimony of a child with autism. The magistrate made statements that were considered inappropriate, referring to an alleged “epidemic” of autism diagnoses and questioning the need for high values for the pension. The statements of the judge generated indignation, leading OAB to publicly repudiate his words. The entity argues that such statements are discriminatory and may undermine the rights of children, women and people with disabilities. The OAB, in conjunction with several committees, is preparing a requirement for measures aimed at approaching the situation formally with the CNJ.
In addition, the OAB highlights the relevance of fighting stereotypes that may lead to discrimination. The entity reaffirms its commitment to promoting equal treatment and the defense of fundamental rights, especially in cases involving vulnerabilities. The draft that will be presented to the CNJ seeks to ensure that situations like this do not repeat and that the rights of the parties involved are respected. The repercussion of the judge’s statements highlights the need for a broader debate on the social perception of autism and how to have alimony -related issues are dealt with in the judiciary.
Posted by Sarah Paula
*Report produced with the aid of AI
