He has taken on Friday in his right to freedom expression and “political critic” to justify the attacks he directed in his social networks against the delegated prosecutor of hate and discrimination crimes of Valencia, Susana Gisbert. The leader of the Fiesta (Salf) has ended up before the magistrate Juan Ramón Berdugo, who investigates him for several messages that he directed through Telegram against Gisbert and that, according to the high court, they can constitute a crime of harassment.
This is the second time that the agitator voluntarily declares as investigated in the Supreme, to which he is aggroidized for his parliamentary status. Alvise already appeared on June 6 before the judge investigating him for a false test of the former Minister of Health and current president of the Generalitat, Salvador Illa. On that occasion, the Salf leader claimed that he just forwarded an image that had been circulating on the Internet for a long time since he did it without “bad faith”, although the Prosecutor’s Office considers that the image made it.
The Ultra agitator has framed his messages against Gisbert in the “political critic.” “For these types of issues that before, they were freedom of expression, today I have to declare in the Supreme Court,” said Alvise at the exit of the Court. The Eurodiput has justified his performance because, he says, he limited himself to questioning a prosecutor who “wants to put people who criticize mass immigration in prison.”
The investigation for which he has declared this Friday is based on the reasoned exhibition that sent the high court a court of Valencia, which had opened proceedings after the complaint of the prosecutor Gisbert for an alleged crime of insults to public official, coercion and hate. In her complaint, the prosecutor gave an account of messages that had been disclosed in the Alvise Telegram channel and that had led to people she did not know to send her threatening or insulting messages through social networks.
The message Alvise published on Telegram spread personal data from Gisbert, to which the agitator Ultra indicated for pursuing hate crimes. “These people are the one who is fine and trying to put thousands of Spaniards in prison to say that the massive illegal immigration is an invasion. They are organized by cities. Let’s look ‘Invasion’ together. “
The Supreme, after study stalking y which consists in intimidating a person, in this case, through social networks. The magistrates point out that the now Eurodiput made “a call to a group close to 40,000 followers” to express and develop “an animosity” towards the prosecutor. In addition, the room warns, Alvise made a second appeal to mobilize his followers after many of them had expressed their intention to act against Gisbert and his family.
The Court warns in this attitude of the SALF leader “a voluntary and conscious intention to compromise, in a permanent and deep way, the normal development of the daily life of its victim, from the persecution that the hundreds of people who assume their challenge could deploy.” These facts fit the crime of harassment cited by the magistrates.
The supreme has one, focused on the alleged financing of SALF, its electoral group, and has yet to decide if it also opens caused at least three other complaints that you have on the table.
