Some fierce scholars were not offended after the former president () called his supporters who, camped before barracks to protest the victory of (PT) in 2022, defended a new military coup in the country. On the contrary, many give reason to the man who continue to call myth.
At least this was the most common reaction in messages exchanged by Bolsonaro admirers.
A Sheet He talked to some of them, including people who were in Brasilia in the January 8 attacks, and the feeling that prevails is that the former president is right to separate the chaff (people who would hurt the cause) from wheat (they, “good pockets”).
In interrogation in the Supreme Federal Court, against the minister, Bolsonaro called “crazy” his voters who were “with that idea of AI-5, military intervention.”
Carla Ferreira, 52, who says she works “in the beauty area” and having Charlo Ferreson as a political code name, subscribes to what he said.
“We really pockets are born of anti-PT and pro-impeachment movements [de Dilma Rousseff]we have no bond with military intervention, “he says.” The purpose of us has always been the issue of democracy and winning in the vote. “
Like her political icon, she says she believes that “the ballot boxes can be fraudulent, yes”, stressing that he does not speak for “achism”, because “the population lives suffering blows in their own bank accounts.”
Charlo has a thesis: Minority in Bolsonarism, interventionist groups have infiltrated the general demonstrations to sabotage them. “They characterized us, because of them, from a radical right.”
These people, she claim, was not with the “myth” of any thing. They were actually aligned with General Hamilton Mourão, now Senator for Republicans and at the time of Bolsonaro.
Bolsonaro gave several before, during and after his presidency. In 2019, his father’s first year at Planalto Palace, Deputy Eduardo Bolsonaro (PL-SP) stated that “if the left radicalizes,” the answer “could be via a new AI-5”.
Charlo did not go to the federal capital on January 8, 2023. Felipe and Amauri (fictitious names) were there and ask for anonymity because they fear being arrested – otherwise about 1,500 people arrested for involvement on the day, the two managed to pass under the radar of justice.
Felipe says he left Sao Paulo with friends on suspicion of the counting of votes that consecrated Lula.
They arrived at dawn on the 7th and were camped, but without defending military interference, he says. The goal, he said, was to protest peacefully and with prayer. So you think it doesn’t serve you the hood of “crazy”. Bolsonaro referred to ruggles, in his view.
Already Amauri was upset about the former president’s speech, although he continues to see Bolsonaro as a born leader. For him, all in the reserve captain’s speech suggested that the military presence would be fundamental to, in his words, to put Brazil on the tracks again.
He speculates that Bolsonaro said what he said to “soften” Alexandre de Moraes. It defines the strategy as smart, as it would be better to grant now and recover strength, so that in the future back to the cargo against “true scammers” —Moraes and Lula.
Civil engineer Giovani Falcone, who did not travel to Brasilia at the beginning of 2023, says that requests for military action were “isolated cases”.
There were many “unhappy with Lula’s arrival”, but “our Armed Forces” were not even “prepared for such confrontation”, and there was no “disorder in the state” that justified such interference – that, for him, made sense in 1964, to stroke communism in the country.
Bolsonaro, therefore, would have said nothing much in the Supreme Court.
He sends the report a video that arrived in a pocket group of. The assembly, made with artificial intelligence, shows Bolsonaro with a clown filter on his face. He says his “Deep Fake”: “I’m here once again to manipulate you and summon another demonstration of ‘Gadolândia'”.
Falcone said AI is “unfortunate”, but just a joke. “The people are already making fun.”
Related materials circulated through the pockets, says Felipe Bailez, who monitors data on the internet.
Example of reactive content to the Conducting Certificate issued by the former president for his supporters: a woman, dressed in the colors of the national flag, says that “we are crazy, yes, Bolsonaro, because one day we vote for you.”
She accuses him of inducing her electorate to go to the head of the barracks and ends up saying she would change to Lula’s side. Another post, extracted from the closed group with Bolsonaro, overlaps with his image laugh: “I raised, yes, mané! It was defending me because I wanted. You are already big.”
It was not possible to specify the authorship of these publications, but Bailez bets that they may “have been created in leftist niches” until they migrate to pockets.
A public voice to break up with the former president was his former Minister of Education, today disaffected, Abraham Weintraub.
He, who at a ministerial meeting in 2020 said he would put “these vagabonds all in jail, starting at the Supreme Court,” Bolsonaro’s testimony was annoyed last week. “I was very sucker.”
It was not exactly the label of “crazy” that bothered, says Weintraub to the newspaper. “It was his posture that disgusted me. I already accepted that Bolsonaro lied and deceived me, that he was always from the center and that he pretended to be right.
Positive mentions to the former president, however, prevailed among their supporters, as pointed out by the Palver survey. Case of the invitation for Moraes to be deputy on his plate next year -Bolsonaro is ineligible by order of the Supreme Court.
His “irony” during the interrogation, according to Palver, “would reinforce the narrative that there was no blow and that the accusations against him are unfounded, despite political pressure.” This is what most pockets believe.
