The “preventive” attack on Iran determined by the premie from, with the help of the US President, is a sound and dangerous disaster.
a country was assaulted on the grounds that it would be about to produce a nuclear artifact – overpoweringly, in the course of a process of diplomatic negotiations on the subject.
The two leaders, notorious trampalineiros in front of countries with nuclear power, invested in an irresponsible action, waving with results that were not hit. The global scenario may get worse, offering the Iranian regime more reasons to seek the bomb, which would give it regional defense and influence capacity.
Netanyahu justified the attacks by considering Iran represents.
How should the genocide operation in Gaza be classified, which goes far beyond what would be a legitimate response to the Hamas terrorist attack? “Existential Threat” seems little to designate the criminal campaign against the Palestinian people, that the official word calls Gaza’s “obliteration” – destruction, the indiscriminate killing of civilians, children and women, and the unnameable torture for the suppression of victims. And what about the colonization of the West Bank? An adult in the room really believes Netanyahu has in mind a “two -state solution”?
Trump, who tends to consider the manifestations of exhaustion of much of American society with distant and unjustifiable wars, perhaps not resisting the temptation to once again show the world the geopolitical and military phallus of his country, which is now confused with his own.
The two colleagues of supremism and autocratic inclinations are actually an existential threat to a better world. The Republican invests against liberal order, free trade, democratic institutions and civil rights. Netanyahu is a war criminal who puts his ambitions above all.
None of this makes something less sinister than it has always been. The world is not a place of virtuous leaders with secular and democratic nature.
The reality, to rain in the wet, is complex, and the path of diplomacy and multilateralism would be the most reasonable, although – for that reason – it was rarely so sabotaged.
The signs that the world order of Trump into account, from a military point of view, are suggestive, respect for the areas of influence of superpowers – Russia, China and their America.
Europe, still a polo of defense of civilizing rights and principles, is pushed into a geopolitical limb – and the result will be to invest more in militarization.
No, Trump tries to hold his hands to the monarchical dictatorship of Saudi Arabia and the government of the far right of Israel. Russia and China manifest themselves discreetly and do not get into.
Thus, while the conflict in Ukraine continues and the war led by Israel as well, it is not unlikely that China soon feels more comfortable to carry out its annexation project of. Threat is not lacking.
Gift Link: Did you like this text? Subscriber can release seven free hits from any link per day. Just click on F Blue below.
