The crisis between executive and congress, around, eventually reinforced the government’s strategy to re -present itself as defender of the poor against the wealthy.
In this reality show of politics that tries to anticipate the 2026 wall, with increased taxes on banks, bets and billionaires. The idea, debatable as a strategy, is to put a hint of class struggle in the debate and paste in the congress to the defender of privilege.
In this polarized choreography, truths, lies, so-called, and unthinee are intertwined in the sacrifice of the complexity of the problems at the table.
Economists converge to the conclusion that, yes, the Brazilian tax regime is wicked and favors the richest, regardless of the tangle of rates and rates that tax reform will help in the coming years undo or make less exasperating.
The minister also has a difficult point to denied, when referring to. It is the already famous “fiscal spending”.
Not everything possibly will be absurd at this festival of favors, but there is no doubt that a significant part of courtesy makes no sense. It is a subject to be faced with perseverance and maturity.
On the contrary, when the debate turns to public accounts, the government hastened not to recognize the problematic effects of indexing real increases in the minimum wage to social security payments and the unsustainable elevation of mandatory budget expenses. “Ah, but let’s not throw the weight of adjusting the back of the poorest,” will say the BBB tax advocates.
The question is not so simple. Experts of good character and social sensitivity – or that is, those who do not sigh and revolve the leaves before the chainsaw of – they believe it is possible to equate indexing and the advancement of expenses in order to find greater budget flexibility that would allow, in theory, more government choices and improvement in the quality of spending. There would still be room for administrative reform on the public machine – will we start with the supersalaries? – and increased productivity in times of technological advances.
One step in this sense would help with expectation management. A country with fiscal equilibrium signaling would be better prepared to, even by reducing spending on the very high and consideration Selic. It would not be bad for Lula, who already has, by the way, good indicators of the real economy to show.
It seems difficult to discuss these issues with a public spirit at a time when Congress increases the number of parliamentarians and is fixed in its undesirable amendments. And yet, the mayor ,.
Between champagne bubbles in Lisbon, ministers of trying to help in “Come on” to defy the reality show. To see.
Gift Link: Did you like this text? Subscriber can release seven free hits from any link per day. Just click on F Blue below.
