The defendant Juraj Cintula, who seriously shot Prime Minister Robert Fico (Smer-SD) last May 15 in Handlova, has a tendency to impulsive to aggressive action. At the time of committing the deed, he was present with a mixed personality disorder, but his recognition and control capabilities were maintained. He is aware of the unlawfulness of his actions. This is stated in the experts of experts from the Department of Psychiatry and Psychology, which they read on Tuesday at the Specialized Criminal Court (STS), the workplace of Banská Bystrica, where the process with the bomber is held.
According to experts, the defendant rebelled his entire life against the regime and authorities, trying to change society, He wanted to be the one who decides and had ambitions that he failed to realize. He longed to prove something, to achieve admiration, attention, recognition, success. After 70, he realized that time was running out. The government’s exit meeting could therefore be seen as an opportunity, and therefore if he did not, he would fail. Since he failed to achieve such a disruption of health in the injured party so that he is no longer a prime minister, He cannot be ruled out by the commitment of crime if he is free.
Juraj Cintula in court refused to testify more closely to the deed, so his notice of pre -trial proceedings was read. He was led to the deed by anger against the Prime Minister. He disagreed with the policy of the current government, considered it Judas against the EU, and, among other things, he wanted military assistance to be provided to Ukraine.
He decided to harm Fico’s health so that he was no longer able to perform the Prime Minister’s function. He chose a government meeting in Handlova. The moment Fico headed among the sympathizers, he pulled out the weapon he was in legal possession and fired five times. As the defendant claims, he deliberately shot down, to his feet, did not want to kill him.
Juraj Cintula faces an indictment for a particularly serious crime of the terrorist attack committed on a protected person. He is at risk of life. His defense does not agree with the legal qualification of the act.
