Neither has received final approval from the House and its supporters already provide that, even approved, the text must contest in the (Federal Supreme Court).
The expectation is that an ADI (direct action of unconstitutionality) will be presented to deal with points, such as LAC (license for adhesion and commitment), granted by the promise of compliance with previous requirements established by control bodies.
The proposal is in the House, under the rapporteur of Deputy Zé Vitor (PL-MG), who, as the column showed ,.
The project was debated on Tuesday (8) in the parliamentary front of agriculture, which supports it, and it is expected to be voted on July 14 and 18.
“It is inevitable that the vote losers enter an ADI, because everything is judicialized in Brazil and the supreme gets into everything, but parliament has to defend its prerogative. The legislation is legally impeccable. You can disagree with your ideological worldview, but there is no role for the supreme to merit the discussion,” says Kim Kataguiri (União Brasil-SP).
The expectation of parliamentarians is that ADI in the Supreme will come through parties, not the Lula Government (PT), which has a favorable wing of the project.
The project provides that the license for adhesion and commitment can be used for small and medium -sized potential projects, but critics evaluate that the Supreme would allow only for the first group.
During the process of the subject in the Senate, critics of the proposal already evaluated that she had unconstitutional points.
Environmental organizations also publicly affirm that the proposal violates points of the Constitution and previous decisions of the Supreme.
Gift Link: Did you like this text? Subscriber can release seven free hits from any link per day. Just click on F Blue below.
