He Supreme Court of the United States go on Clearing the way to Donald Trump For the Republican to implement the aggressive agenda of his second term and removing in his favor and expanding the powers of the Presidency. This Tuesday, the high court gave the green light to the massive dismissals of officials and restructuring or even complete elimination of agencies, which can perform Even if Congress has not authorized it.
Although it is a Unpleasant order, It is known that two of the progressive judgesSonia Sotomayor and Elena Kagan, They joined their six conservative colleaguesSy only magistrate Ketanji Brown Jackson wrote a dissent opinion. That vote of Sotomayor and Kagan is explained because the decision does not determine if the specific plans of dismissals and restructuring are legal, which could be stopped after the resolution of the case in lower instances or by other demands.
The eight magistrates, however, remove an obstacle to Trump. And determine that “The government will probably succeed with the argument that the Executive Order and the Memorandum are legal ”that the Republican signed in February, urging federal agencies to work with Doge, the so -called “department” of government efficiency to whose front put Elon Musk and that raised deep cuts in the government.
This Back of the Supreme Trump arrives a few weeks after the Six conservative judges will weaken another safeguard from the separation of powers al subtract at lower judicial instances the ability to stop Even temporarily some of the president’s actions, except for minimal exceptions.
On that occasion, the case in the center of the decision touches Trump’s attempt to eliminate the right of citizenship by birth, one of the elements of his agenda against immigration.
The US Federation of Government Employees, which represents 820,000 of those public workers, denounced on Tuesday the last decision of the Supreme serious blow to democracy“That” puts in serious danger services on which the American people depends. “
The jueza Brown Jacksonwhich has begun to stand out for signing the most critical opinions with the conservative majority, has written that it is “the wrong decision at the wrong time, Especially given how little this court knows what is happening on the ground. ”
The magistrate, who is on a promotional tour of a memoir, is being meaningless for opinions and especially hard public statements. Has come to say that lThe decisions of the Supermayoria represent “an existential threat to the rule of law” And they are creating “a Zone without law in which the Executive has the prerogative to follow or ignore the law as you want ”, words that caused a recrimination response from Judge Amy Coney Barrett.
Subscribe to continue reading
