President’s allies () classified as a political error the recent position of the governor (Republicans), endorsing the postage of the president.
They claim that Tarcisio can pay a high price because he has shown support for the American publication earlier this week, and has shown the Pro-Trump cap with the inscription “Make America Great Again” earlier this year.
In the evaluation of these allies, these demonstrations in favor of the US government are opposed to the defense of national sovereignty, led by Lula.
A first -level member, who has been following the negotiations, even states that the governor’s strategic stumbling blocks may even affect his electoral project.
From the point of view of the Planalto Palace, the Trump government’s decision reinforces the image that Lula fights powerful interests, including Americans. This is what allies call “us against all” strategy.
An assistant of the petista states that it is not necessary to coordinate these criticisms of Tarcisio, as they are natural, given the councils of the governor himself.
President collaborators cite reactions against Tarcisio in the networks and claim that the moment puts the governor in the face of the impasse between the interests of the government of São Paulo and his personal project, dependent on a support from the former president () to the presidency in 2026.
Constant presence in acts in defense of Bolsonaro, Tarcisio would have to distance himself from the political godfather to protect his own image.
A center minister of the center states that the surcharge imposed by Trump will be politically exploited against all the names on the right who celebrated the Republican’s victory as other governors. But it says that Tarcisio will be a preferential target precisely because he is considered the most viable candidate to face Lula in 2026.
In his words, this kind of behavior shows that the governor of Sao Paulo is hostage to Bolsonarist pressure, pushes his image of moderate politician and shows that Tarcisio is what he classifies as a “50 shades of Bolsonaro”. In the evaluation of another ally of Lula, Tarcisio positioned himself badly and should have silenced to avoid this contradiction.
In light of the advertising of the 50% surcharge to Brazilian products, this Wednesday (9), the evaluation of allies of the petista is that the governor was wrong and should be charged even by his voters, given the eventual damage that this could bring to the State of Sao Paulo.
In addition, they say it will also be explored against Tarcisio the fact that the governor used the cap with Trump’s slogan when the Republican was sworn in. Lula’s allies say there is an imagery potential, above all, that can be used to attack the governor.
the minister (Secretariat of Institutional Relations), classified as “shame” Tarcisio to use the prop. “I think he even regretted it, because how is a state governor the size of Sao Paulo wearing a doll to compliment and to support a president who attacks his country?
Lula’s allies also say that the motto “Brazil is more of the Brazilians”, resuming the, as opposed to the trumpker cap. The minister (health), for example, published a photograph using the accessory with this motto on Wednesday night (9).
On the 7th,, criticizing the cases involving Bolsonaro in both the Supreme Court (STF) and the TSE (Superior Electoral Court). On Wednesday (9), that “Lula put his ideology above the economy, and that is the result.”
This Thursday (10), said that the moment is the performance of Brazilian diplomacy and that there is time to resolve this imbroglio until August. He admitted “negative impact on Sao Paulo” but exempted Bolsonaro in this episode.
Ministers of the Lula administration and allies of the petista in Congress criticized Tarcisio’s stance on Thursday. The minister (farm) said in an interview that the governor of São Paulo “missed a lot”.
“Either a person is a candidate for president or is a candidate for vassal. And there is no space in Brazil for vassalage. What is intending here? Kneel in the face of unilateral aggression without any economic and political foundation?” Haddad said in an interview with the Independent Media Center Barão de Itararé.
Haddad also blamed Bolsonaro for Trump’s decision. According to him, “the Bolsonaro family drew this attack on Brazil and with a specific purpose of escaping from the lawsuit that is underway.”
“The only explanation is political character involving the Bolsonaro family. This is not an unfounded accusation that I am doing, Eduardo Bolsonaro himself told the public that if he does not come forgiveness, things tend to get worse,” he said.
On social networks, names such as the Ministers (House) and, besides the deputies (PT-CE), leader of the government in the House, and (PT-RJ), leader of the party in the house, made criticism of Tarcisio’s stance.
Rui Costa said to regret the conduct of the governor, stating that he defends the tariff imposed by the Republican government “instead of defending the population of his state and Brazil as a nation.”
“It is understandable that you want to please the former president to whom he served as minister, but who values São Paulo does not support absurd, illegal and immoral measures imposed by foreigners,” wrote the head of the Civil House.
Gleisi, in turn, countered Tarcisio’s statement and said that who is putting ideology above the country’s interests is the governor and “all Bolsonaro accomplices that applaud Trump’s tariff against Brazil.”
The minister (entrepreneurship), considered a potential candidate for the government of São Paulo in 2026, published a video criticizing Tarcisio and demanding that the governor resign to office.
HAS Sheet He classifies the episode as “the most serious mistake of a governor of São Paulo in terms of international market.” “It will bring traumatic consequences to the São Paulo Agro,” says France.
