Moraes tells Filipe Martins’s lawyer to be “quieto”

Minister Alexandre de Moraes, from (Supreme Federal Court), said on Monday (14.Jul.2025) that criminal lawyer Jeffrey Chiquini, who defends the former advisor, “should have taken a competition for the Public Prosecution Service”If they wanted to conduct the prosecution. Martins is a defendant in court for attempted coup.

The statement was given during a new statement by Lieutenant Colonel Mauro Cid as a informant. The testimony applies to the PHC (criminal actions), and (nuclei 2, 3 and 4, respectively) of the attempted coup d’état.

Chiquini began the testimony asking for the hearing to be suspended. He said he had 4 business days to analyze 78 terabytes of information to exercise the contradictory, which was “Humanly impossible”. The lawyer also stated that the instruction of core 1 was over and that it was not possible to ask questions to the accused.

In response, Moraes talked about how this had already been determined by the previous core. “Who asked for this material, who gathered was not the accusation. It was the defenses. There is nothing in this material that is imputed”these.

Then the STF minister was interrupted by the lawyer and warned him. “Doctor, while I speak, the Lord is quiet”Said Moraes.

The minister repressed the lawyer. “If you want to conduct the prosecution, you should have taken a competition for the Public Prosecution Service ”these. “It is not the Lord who must tell PGR if he will report his client in core 1, core 2 or core 3. ”

STF makes testimonials

The Supreme Court began this Monday (14.Jul) listening to the testimonies of witnesses indicated by PGR.

In the afternoon, he hears Mauro Cid as a informant, having closed an award -winning collaboration agreement. The statements apply to the AP (criminal actions), and (nuclei 2, 3 and 4, respectively).

The testimonials will be held until July 23, by video conferencing. Here’s the schedule:

• 14.jul.2025: testimonials of prosecution witnesses indicated by the PGR;
• also on 14.Jul: Speaks of Lieutenant Colonel Mauro Cidas informant. He signed award -winning agreement. Your testimony will be common to the 3 actions and displayed in the 1st Class;
• 15 a 21.jul: Defense testimony of Core 2in the 1st Class;
• 15 E 16 JUL: Defense testimony of Core 4in the 2nd Class;
• 21 a 23.jul: Defense testimony of Nucleus 3also in the 2nd class.

The instructional phase is the stage of production production for prosecution and defense. The defense witnesses were appointed by the defendants’ lawyers.

Who are the defendants

Core 2:

• FERNANDO DE SOUSA OLIVEIRA – Federal Police Delegate;
• Filipe Martins -Former International Presidency Assessor;
• MARCELO COSTA CAMERA -Army reserve colonel and former presidency advisor;
• MARÍLIA FERREIRA DE ALENCAR -Delegate and former director of intelligence of the Federal Police;
• Mário Fernandes – General of the Army Reserve;
• Silvinei Vasques -Former director general of the Federal Highway Police.

Nucleus 3:

• Bernardo Romão Correa Netto – Army colonel;
• Fabrício Moreira de Bastos – Army colonel;
• Márcio Nunes de Resende Jr. – Army colonel;
• Hélio Ferreira Lima -Army Lieutenant Colonel;
• RAFAEL MARTINS DE OLIVEIRA -Army Lieutenant Colonel;
• Rodrigo Bezerra de Azevedo -Army Lieutenant Colonel;
• Ronald Ferreira de Araújo Jr. -Army Lieutenant Colonel;
• Sérgio Ricardo Cavaliere de Medeiros -Army Lieutenant Colonel;
• Estevam Theophilo Gaspar de Oliveira – General of the Army Reserve;
• Wladimir Matos Soares – Federal Police Agent.

Core 4:

• AILTON MORAES BARROS -Former Army Major;
• Ângelo Denicoli – Major of the Army Reserve;
• Giancarlo Rodrigues – Warrant Officer of the Army;
• Guilherme Almeida -Army Lieutenant Colonel;
• Reginaldo Abreu – Army colonel;
• Marcelo Bormevet – Federal Police Agent;
• Carlos Cesar Moretzsohn Rocha – President of the Voting Legal Institute.

All accused respond for the crimes of:

• attempted violent abolition of the Democratic Rule of Law;
• attempted coup d’etat;
• participation in armed criminal organization;
• Qualified damage;
• deterioration of listed assets.