The minister of the (Federal Supreme Court), rebuked on Monday (14) lawyer Jeffrey Chiquini, defense of former presidential advisor Filipe Martins, for questions and interventions considered by him impertinent. Moraes asked the lawyer not to rise the case.
The rapporteur of the case of the coup plot led in this second new testimony of the lieutenant colonel as a witness to the process. Moraes marked this week the hearing sessions of the witnesses of three more centers of the case, which continue until July 23.
At the beginning of the session, Chiquini presented several questions to the minister, such as the volume of evidence, a document not found in the file or an interlocutory appeal and still unanswered. Moraes rejected all requests and questions, and at one time the lawyer and the minister began to speak at the same time.
“As I speak, the Lord is quiet. We will not touch, doctor,” said Moraes.
Moraes had several clashes with the defenders throughout the session. Also in the early afternoon, when denying another issue of Chiquini order, the minister said the lawyer was extrapolating his role.
“It is not the Lord who will dictate whether PGR must report its client in core 1, 2 or 3. Otherwise, he should have a competition for the Attorney’s Office,” he said.
There was also a clash when the lawyer, defender of another defendant, Marcelo Câmara, asked Cid about the concept of monitoring for the Armed Forces.
Kuntz said he would insist on the question because he understands that it is not a matter of Portuguese, but military language. “And I will insist on rejecting. Let’s go to the next,” Moraes replied.
The testimonies of the Central Core of the complaint, which includes former President Jair Bolsonaro (PL), were closed in June, and the process is already in the final allegations phase of the parties.
The audiences this Monday began in the morning, but Moraes drove only the hearing of Mauro Cid. At first, the assistant judge of the office of Minister Rafael Henrique Window Tamai Rocha presided over the session.
The Attorney General of the Republic, Paulo Gonet, was not present, being represented by prosecutors Joaquim Cabral da Costa Neto and Gabriela Starling Jorge Vieira de Mello.
In the first part, the former intelligence director of the PRF (Federal Highway Police) Adiel Pereira Alcântara and former Bolsonaro’s intelligence analist, Clebson Ferreira de Paula Vieira, were heard.
Both have already given testimonials as witnesses called by the defendants of the central nucleus.
Adiel was asked about the corporation’s blitze during the second round of the 2022 election. He again said that he was surprised by the requests for a support to the Director of Intelligence on Bus and Vans originating in the states of Sao Paulo, Minas Gerais, Goiás and Rio de Janeiro to the Northeast.
Likewise, which disputed the 2022 presidential election. According to the analyst, then -minister Anderson Torres’s team had demanded two analyzes after the first round of the election. The first was to identify the cities where the candidates had more than 70% of the votes, and the second dealt with the distribution of the PRF staff.
On Monday, Cid again said that Filipe Martins took to convene new and arrest opponents to former President Bolsonaro analyzes-he denies.
Martins’s role involved acting as a bridge between the Chancellor and the Planalto Palace.
“[O documento] It was composed of two parts: the first part was the considerations and the second part were acts of determinations that should be taken, “said Cid.
Asked what these actions would be, he cited the arrest of STF ministers and former Senate President Rodrigo Pacheco (PSD-MG).
“After he left the meeting with the president, with the changes made by the president, he came to my table where I was, where I was in the auxiliary room, with this document already scribbled. And then he was going to make the changes. And that was when he took his computer to make modifications, proposed by the president,” said Cid.
During the interrogation of the defendant of the central core of the case, Cid said he felt frustrated by the interpretations of the statements he gave to the award -winning collaboration.
According to Cid, he had a different understanding of the investigators about the facts that narrated in the denunciation that helped support the complaint about the 2022 coup plot. “They had an investigative line and I had another view of the facts. And there was a frustration of what I was counting on not being on the PF investigative line,” he said.
As the denunciation is one of the leading wires of the complaint, the defendants of the other defendants have tried to invalidate it. After the interrogations, one of the questioning points was an Instagram profile, @gabrielar702, linked to Mauro Cid’s email in Gmail.
Celso Vilardi, the former president’s lawyer, who did not use the profile to communicate with people in. “The whistleblower’s lies have not only been huddled, but they are increasingly blatant and apparently involve proof destruction,” he said.
In the case of the “Gabrielar702” account, the lawyer has subparated photos and audios of conversations he says he kept with the military in which he allegedly counts details of his testimonials and makes outstanding, which would put the denunciation in check.
On the other hand, on June 26, Cid told that lawyers linked to the former president tried the case. According to the military, the offensive would have been made by, and from August 2023.
Moraes determined on the 18th the opening of an investigation against Kuntz and Câmara to investigate eventual obstruction of justice. .
The STF minister marked the hearings on June 27 with the forecast of listening to more than a hundred witnesses. The sessions continue until the 23rd. The names were nominated by the defendants of the defendants.
Cid is heard again for being informant of the case. Thus, his testimony applies to the three nuclei with hearings scheduled for the next few days.
Moraes of the Licensed Deputy (-SP) and the councilman (PL-RJ), provided for in the criminal action of the second nucleus of the complaint of the coup plot of 2022.
Moraes justified that the two cannot be heard as witnesses because they are targeted by related investigations and children of a correlato case defendant-in the case, the former president (PL).
