(Attorney General’s Office) the conviction of the former president () and the other seven defendants.
The position is in the final allegations of the prosecution in the case, delivered by the minister, (Supreme Federal Court).
In the PGR document, Gonet deals with inconsistencies in and suggests a reduction of only one third of the sentence, not two thirds he would be entitled to for collaboration.
Gonet quotes both the episode in which Moraes heard the former Bolsonaro orders again, in November 2024, because of alleged omissions related to a plan to kill and kidnap authorities regarding the information, which came up in June this year, that he would have an active account on social networks to communicate with the former president.
Gonet states, on the one hand, that omissions and the adoption of an “ambiguous narrative” would not affect the evidence of the action – which has a central element in ICD.
“Given the contradictory behavior, marked by omissions and resistance to full compliance with agreed obligations, it is understood that the reduction of the penalty should be fixed at minimum level. It suggests, in the wake of this construction, the reduction of 1/3 of the penalty,” says PGR.
Thus the PGR rejects granting judicial forgiveness or conversion of restrictive penalty of rights, “since these benefits require effective collaboration, full and based on good faith, requirements not fully evidenced in the present case.”
The play was delivered moments before the deadline, which was at 11:59 pm. The expectation in the Supreme is that the process on the attempted coup d’état.
The former president has already been convicted by the TSE for attacks and lies about the electoral system and is. Today is ineligible at least until 2030.
If convicted of crimes of armed criminal organization, attempted violent abolition of the Democratic Rule of Law, coup d’état, damage qualified by violence and serious threat against public assets and deterioration of listed heritage, a.
In the presidency, it caused crises between the powers, and stimulated with lies and yields a campaign to discredit the country’s electoral system.
After the defeat to Lula, he encouraged the creation and maintenance of the scammers who spread across the country and gave rise to the attacks of January 8.
In this same period, he adopted conduct that he contributed to keeping his hopeless supporters that he would remain in power, and he met with nearby military and advisers to discuss ways to intervene in the TSE and nullify the elections.
