The excellent black center forward Pedro became a stone on the way to Flamengo this season, in which he projected himself to him until his ownership in the Brazilian team.
With a millionaire salary, he is in the Golden Glory Berlinda, accused by the firm and thoughtful coach Filipe Luís of being, at least, bad professional, already for two games outside the group.
The talented midfielder Alvinegro Memphis Depay sees his image of marketer to pow to Corinthians’ trajectory in 2025, where he was expected of him, again starting in the Dutch national team, the role of leader of a campaign without suffering.
With even more millionaire salary, he is also in the golden spot of Parque São Jorge, although with delays to receive the negotiated, accused of making soft body and forcing suspension so as not to travel the fortress and stop facing Ceará for the Brazilian Championship.
In the case of the Corinthian, with the condescending silence of coach Dorival Júnior.
Pedro became the object of controversy and divides opinions in the press and among the grointers.
Memphis has not yet found those who defend him, despite having at least the irrefutable argument of being entitled to act with disdain with those who do not fulfill the contractor.
Among former players with ample media space, the ever-wise Dr. Eduardo Gonçalves de Andrade, better known as tostāo, in this Sheetand the explosive Walter Casagrande Júnior, also known as Casão, at UOL Esporte and TV Bandeirantes, according to Filipe Luís, greet the attitude of putting an end in the paternalism in force for years in Brazilian football.
Neto and Vanderlei Luxembourg, in Band, were next to Pedro, as well as respectable journalists from Alicia Klein, Arnaldo Ribeiro, Domitila Becker and Milly Lacombe, UOL Esporte.
Others, also from UOL, such as Danilo Lavieri, Eduardo Tironi, Jose Trajano, Mauro Cezar Pereira, Rodrigo Mattos, finally, from the class of this one who writes you, supported the most diverse arguments of Filipe Luís, without decreasing the importance of Peter for the group.
So also manifested another neighbor in this Sheet,, Sandro Macedo, who, with a good humor, recalled that he was Pedro criticized by other coaches and, essential, that the current one would never say what he said without support of the cast.
Those who differ raise the hypothesis of bullying and the club’s asset devaluation, although it is uncomfortable to treat athletes as goods.
It is also argued with the fact that Peter was not heard, even if no one has prevented him-less for what one knows.
There are also those who doubt whether Philip Louis’s statements would have been made if Flamengo had lost to Sao Paulo.
Wouldn’t they have been even more blunt, packed by the disappointment of defeat?
Anyway, at the top of the Brazilian Championship table, would it be better to keep the relationship crisis between four walls, how is traditional?
Or does sunlight follow as the best detergent there is?
This column is adept at unrestricted transparency, “duel to quien duel”.
As you are sure that the best for Flamengo will be the agreement between the parties at the end of the crisis caused by Pedro.
Gift Link: Did you like this text? Subscriber can release seven free hits from any link per day. Just click on F Blue below.
