The (Attorney General’s Office) raised suspicions, on the trip that former public security secretary says he made Disney days before.
According to the text signed by, there is evidence of falsehood in the document presented by the defense that he would have traveled on vacation with his family on January 6, 2023, few before the scammers in the Three Powers Square.
After the statement, Torres’s lawyer brought to the file a statement of airline tickets and car rental in Orlando, Florida, and stated that PGR’s suspicion is “absolutely unfair and unfounded” and “true accusatory abuse.”
Torres was Minister of Justice of the Government (PL) and became secretary of the Federal District after the end of the term of the former president.
PGR’s final allegations were filed on Monday (14) in the (Supreme Court) and claim that Anderson Torres’s defense had only gathered in the process a print of the ticket, “without presenting proof of purchase or the autonomous air ticket.”
“It turns out that the Attorney General’s Office has identified the possible falseness of the document presented by the defense, which not only reinforces the severity of defendant Anderson Torres’ conduct at the time of crimes, but should justify the adoption of additional measures regarding the newly unlawful fact,” said PGR.
PGR sought the airline Gol and questioned the flight, which replied that the informed locator “does not match the data described on behalf of Anderson Gustavo Torres” and did not identify the former minister’s name on the flight. Sought, Gol said it would not speak.
“The scandalous finding puts in check the defendant’s version that his trip was already scheduled since long before and confirms his deliberate strategy of removal and connivance with violent actions that approached,” says the allegations that they still add to the version that there was prior communication of the trip to the governor of the Federal District “and that the defense did not prove the statement in the case.
Torres’s lawyer, Eumar Novacki, brought information about buying the tickets the next day, on the case file.
In the petition, he said that there is “an unacceptable attempt to build an incriminating plot against an innocent, ignoring robust documentary evidence that attests unmistakably attesting the regular emission of tickets, effective payment through the BSP-EATA system [de transações financeiras entre agentes de viagens e companhias aéreas] and the binding of the data to the name of the accused and his family members. “
“What is seen, therefore, is a relentless persecution, which aims not only at the condemnation of Anderson Torres, but to the destruction of his family, completely overflowing from the limits of legality, good faith, due process of law and procedural loyalty,” said the lawyer.
A certificate of the Agency Viagens Pimentur is attached to the purchase of tickets to Anderson and his family, the flight data and the vehicle rental reserve.
The defense also says that, according to the Tourism Agency, the flight locator “may have been reused by the airline system after a certain period.” “This automatic recycling is common in the air sector and can generate inconsistency in the current search, without, however, compromising the authenticity and validity of the original emission,” says the defense.
Despite this petition, the defense of Anderson Torres may still present any eventual evidence in his final allegations, which will still be delivered to the Supreme.
The PGR piece was delivered to the STF moments before the end of the deadline, which was at 11:59 pm on Monday.
The expectation in the Supreme is that the process on the attempted coup d’état.
In addition to Anderson Torres, they are defendants on charges of joining the central nucleus of the coup plot: Jair Bolsonaro (former president), Walter Braga Netto (former minister), (Federal Deputy and former Chief of Abin), (former Navy Commander) (former GSI minister), (former Bolsonaro orders) and (former Defense Minister).
All the defendants of the case respond for armed criminal organization, attempted violent abolition of the Democratic Rule of Law, coup d’état, damage qualified by violence and serious threat against public assets and deterioration of listed heritage. Added, maximum penalties may exceed 40 years in prison.
