The minister, of the (Supreme Federal Court), used the vote on the measures against () to comment on the offensive of the President of, against Brazil. According to the magistrate, the statements and actions of the American are “intolerable strategy of political retaliation”.
Dino accompanied to validate Bolsonaro’s decision and imposed measures against him, such as the use of an electronic anklet and the ban on communication with his son in the United States, licensed deputy Eduardo Bolsonaro (PL-SP).
Throughout 10 pages out of a total of 13 of the vote, Dino recalls Trump’s demonstrations, recovers that of colleagues, such as or a, entities notes and countera -American arguments with data from the Brazilian government.
According to the minister, the US government stance is a kidnapping of the economy in relief to Bolsonaro.
“This coercion assumes an unprecedented form: the” kidnapping “of the economy of a nation, threatening companies and jobs, aiming to demand that the Supreme Court will pay the” rescue “, filing a judicial case at the request of the Attorney General’s Office, under the exclusive regency of Brazilian laws,” he said.
The confidential procedure that led to the application of Bolsonaro measures was filed with the STF and distributed to Alexandre de Moraes’s office on July 11, two days after Trump announced the 50% surcharge on Brazilian products citing the process against the former president in the STF.
The first class of the Court analyzes the measures from 12h and the trial will continue until 11:59 pm next Monday (21). The session was opened at 12h. Already from Moraes.
In addition to Moraes, rapporteur of the case, the class is formed by the ministers, president, and.
“It is explicit that the intolerable strategy of political retaliation, which violates national sovereignty by embarrassing Brazilian public institutions – including this Supreme Court – is explicit – so that their decisions are subordinate to the personal will of foreign political leader,” he said.
Bolsonaro was the target of search performed by Friday morning and Moraes asked the immediate scheduling of the agenda to the board.
Early on, Dino refers to the current moment of the relationship between the United States and Brazil.
“The events launching this decision in referendum have direct connection with foreign government deliberations, explicitly aimed at the exclusive competences of the Supreme Court. Therefore, it should be noted that Article 1, item I, of the Constitution recognizes national sovereignty as the foundation and structuring principle of the Republic,” he says.
According to Dino, within the scope of international relations, it is not for one state to impose on another rules of operation of its institutions, in order to obtain the desired results from the political point of view.
“In this way, acts tending to capture the capture of the Brazilian state should be repressed to order the functioning of its institutions,” follows Dino.
The minister has resumed the facts since July 9, when Trump discloses the letter to the president of Lula (PT) and announces the economic sanction. Dino says the measures have genuinely political reasons and that there is no justification for raising tariffs. The magistrate cites data from the Ministry of Development, Industry and Foreign Trade that show that Brazil – and not the United States – records commercial deficit since 2009.
“To the extent that Brazilian citizens demand, participate and explicitly defend foreign coercions against the judiciary, aiming for personal benefits, the need for judicial examination of the Federal Police and the Attorney General’s Office is based on ‘comfortable’ omission, would configure betrayal of the homeland-incompatible with the high and unenforceable duties of the STF,” says the minister.
Gift Link: Did you like this text? Subscriber can release seven free hits from any link per day. Just click on F Blue below.
