(-PB) ends the first semester in the presidency of the criticized even by allies, with colleagues and government members (PT) questioning the reliability of the agreements he sewn by him and about ghost employees.
In a sewing that involved from PT to PL, but without making it clear what would be the priorities of its management. After months of the homelessness of the house, he sought a mark when creating a working group to propose one.
The deputy was sought by Sheetbut I didn’t want to comment.
On Wednesday (16), Motta suffered his main defeat by, from 513 to 531. The proposal was personally sewn by Motta to prevent Paraíba, its electoral base, to lose parliamentarians.
Four frequent interlocutors of Motta say he was upset about this decision. Even project advocates say it will be a difficult task to overthrow the presidential veto.
Lula did not previously report to the Congress summit on the veto, which was interpreted as one in June. The would guide the project the next day.
According to two Motta interlocutors, he phoned early in the afternoon to the minister (Secretariat of Institutional Relations) to ask about the subject. He only learned of the veto, however, by the press and, as soon as the information came public, left the House plenary and went to the Senate to talk to David Alcolumbre (Brazil-AP Union).
The conversation also dealt with the STF from validating the presidential decree on IOF. The gesture was even criticized by Motta’s allies, who evaluate that the deputy missed not consulting the leaders of the House before talking to the ally who presides over the Senate. One states that this suggested lack of autonomy at the head of the house.
Upon returning to the House plenary, Motta decided to guide a project that creates subsidized credit to agribusiness with pre-salt oil funds ,. The government publicly complained of breach of agreement, as it negotiated an alternative with less fiscal impact.
Even his allies understood as untimely the “bomb agenda”. Two of them say, under reserve, that this goes against the image he has sought to build, concerned with the fiscal balance and that the executive charges the reducing measures.
There are allies of Motta who minimize complaints and say that expressive votes show that he has the support of the plenary. They claim that he was not defeated in any vote and knew how to circumvent the pressures when dealing with. The text has not advanced in the house, which has annoyed the pockets, who demand a solution to the convicts.
The shudder in the relationship with Lula occurred after a brief honeymoon period. The petista invited him to trips and meetings at the official residence, and Motta attended acts at the Planalto Palace. The president agreed with the support of the PT to the election of Motta, which enabled the construction of wide alliance around his name, negotiated by the predecessor, (PP-AL).
Today, the government complains about unnecessary agreements, such as and an alternative to the increase in IOF – which motorcycle rebates by saying with the measures.
There is still fear among petistas of another hit be broken: that of.
On the other hand, the government can celebrate the return of the possibility of issuing provisional measures, which were waged in Lira management by a conflict with the Senate.
Motta’s allies also cite support for Lula projects, such as private initiative, AEA -The last two, for now only in the commissions.
Part of these proposals advanced after the Government submitted Agenda of the Tax Justice Defense, and the petist social networks. O, but it changed the route, and the house gave progress to the government’s agenda.
Already the opposition complains that Motta indicates behind the scenes the construction of an agreement for the amnesty, but does not lead the project to vote. They have also protested, even with a chat with the mayor, so they considered breaks according to the voting of projects that were not combined.
There are also complaints that he did not adopt firmer posture against what they classify as invasion of parliamentary prerogatives by the Supreme Court. Motta rebates, however, saying that he guided the against Deputy Delegate Alexandre Ramagem (PL-RJ).
The revelation of the existence of, revealed by the Sheetit is also pointed out behind the scenes as a practice that would not be up to the occupant of the presidency of the House, and deputies say the scandal impairs the image of the house.
In public, however, the deputies. Only PSOL deputies advocated on social networks that he explained himself-so discreetly, since he threatens to guide after the recess of the revocation of Deputy Glauber Braga (PSOL-RJ).
A Sheet He revealed that three advisers from his cabinet had routines incompatible with office hours: a physiotherapist who provides clinic service, the social worker of a city hall and a medical student who lived in another state for six months.
Motta declined to comment on the criticism, but at the end of the Wednesday session (16), he thanked his colleagues and said sought to “serve everyone in what I could.”
“I apologize to those I could not correspond to, but they can be sure of one thing: I sleep and wake up every day seeking to be better and seeking to be up to this honorable position that it is to preside over the House of Representatives,” he said.
