The (Attorney General’s Office) requested the minister of (Supreme Federal Court), the former president () as an urgent measure to “ensure the application of criminal law and avoid the defendant’s escape.”
According to the agency, there is “indications of the concrete possibility of escape from the defendant and the maintenance of actions to obstruct the course of criminal action”.
In the decision that determined an operation against the former president, Moraes stated that Jair Bolsonaro’s statements and the performance of the deputy (PL-SP) in the US are attacking national sovereignty, citing the tariff announced by the US president as an “extortion” against Brazilian justice.
The minister mentions that Bolsonaro has in an interview conditioned the end of the sanction to his amnesty.
“National sovereignty cannot, should not and will never be vilified, negotiated or extorted, as it is one of the foundations of the Federative Republic of Brazil,” Moraes said in his decision.
“A sovereign country like Brazil will always know how to defend its democracy and sovereignty and the judiciary will not allow any attempt to submit the operation of the Supreme Court to the sieve of another state, through hostile acts derived from spurious and criminal negotiations of Brazilian politicians with foreign state, with a patent obstruction of justice and clear purpose of coercing this supreme court in the judgment of AP 2.68/DF [ação da trama golpista]”added the minister.
These acts and obstruction, he says, would aim to “create true criminal impunity and favor the defendant Jair Messias Bolsonaro, preventing the judiciary from analyzing, through due process, the criminal imputation made by the Attorney General’s Office.”
Moraes’s decision will be analyzed from the Supreme.
According to Moraes, the implementation of Trump’s surcharge is intended to “create a serious economic crisis in Brazil” to generate political and social pressure in the judiciary and interfere with the action of the coup plot.
She said she received “surprise and indignation” the precautionary measures imposed on the former president. He also said that he “always complied with all the determinations of the judiciary.”
The decision against Bolsonaro occurs at a time when Bolsonarism narrows ties with the US government of Trump. Deputy Eduardo is in the US, and this Friday’s actions are derived from the former president’s son.
The procedure that led to the application of the measures against Bolsonaro was filed with the Supreme Court and distributed to the Moraes Office on July 11, two days after Trump announced the surcharge of citing the lawsuit against the former president in the STF.
In the decision, Moraes, Trump’s demonstration quoting the former president, and says that the conduct “characterizes clear and expressed acts and blatant confessions of the practice of criminal acts.”
He cites suspicions of coercion crimes in the course of the process, obstruction of criminal offense investigation involving criminal organization and sovereignty attack.
The two, says Moraes, acted that they “induce, instigate and assist foreign government the practice of hostile acts to Brazil and the ostensive attempt submission of the operation of the Supreme Court to those of America, for the purpose of ‘filing/extinction’ of AP 2668”.
Bolsonaro was the target of operation by PF. In addition to facing a lawsuit on charges of leading a coup plot, it is also the focus of other investigations conducted by the agency.
Bolsonaro will have to wear an electronic anklet by order of Moraes. He installed the equipment at the headquarters of in Brasilia, and then granted an interview to journalists.
With the anklet, the former president is monitoring by the authorities on the eve of the trial of the coup plot, which could take him to prison.
In the presidency, it caused crises between the powers, and stimulated with lies and yields a campaign to discredit the country’s electoral system.
After the defeat to Lula, he encouraged the creation and maintenance of the scammers who spread across the country and gave rise to the attacks of January 8.
In this same period, he adopted conduct that he contributed to keeping his hopeless supporters that he would remain in power, and he met with nearby military and advisers to discuss ways to intervene in the TSE and nullify the elections.
Saudisist of (1964-1985) and his and of torture, the former president has already been convicted by the TSE for attacks and lies about the electoral system and is. Today is ineligible at least until 2030.
If convicted of crimes of armed criminal organization, attempted violent abolition of the Democratic Rule of Law, coup d’état, damage qualified by violence and serious threat against public assets and deterioration of listed heritage, a.
