Senator Flávio Bolsonaro (PL-RJ), said on Thursday (24), that Senate President David Alcolumbre (Union-AP), who makes “uncompromising defense” of Minister Alexandre de Moraes, of the Supreme Court (Supreme Court).
“When President Alcolumbre will understand that he cannot be making an uncompromising defense in Minister Alexandre de Moraes, whatever it is?” The former president’s son told Portal Metrópoles.
Flávio also stated the president of the Legislative House “must have the responsibility to fulfill his role as head of institution and read my impeachment request against Minister Alexandre de Moraes.”
Last Wednesday (23), the, having the precautionary measures imposed on former President Jair Bolsonaro last week as the main reasons.
“By silent Jair Messias Bolsonaro completely, forbidding him from directly or indirectly manifesting himself on social networks, implicitly forbidding him from granting interviews, public statements and posts on third party channels-under penalty of arrest-Minister Alexandre de Moraes not only violates the former president’s individual right to free demonstration, but suppresses the population’s collective right to have access to their ideas, speeches and positions. A adopted measure restricts the public arena of debate, unbalances the democratic environment and frontally hurts the doctrinal and jurisprudential understanding signed by the court itself to which the minister belongs, ”says the senator in the request.
For Flávio, there is an ideological criterion adopted by the Supreme against Bolsonaro: “This disparity reveals a selective ideological criterion, because in the past the ministers of the Supreme Court tolerated and even understood political and diplomatic manifestations of the left, even when they questioned the legitimacy of national institutions. Censorship, not even public reprimand by the Supreme Court.
According to the calculation of CNN,
Last Monday (21), Senator Damares Alves (Republicans -DF) announced that the magistrate’s impeachment will be the priority agenda of the Senate opposition in the second half.
In the Federal Senate,
