Based on the current rules of, (-SP) will not lose the mandate in 2025 for excessive absences even if it stops attending without justification to all sessions by the end of the year.
The permanence in the mandate even with the son of Living in the United States – and with no date to return – is supported by the 2017 table and also in position manifested by the House after being questioned by Sheet.
The Constitution establishes in its article 55 that the Mandate will lose the deputy or senator who lacks one third of the ordinary sessions of the year, except license or official mission.
In the case of Eduardo, the House records that so far he was missing 21% of the deliberative sessions of 2025 (4 of 19), during the period in which he was in the exercise of his term – he graduated from March 20 until last Saturday (19) to deal with particular interests.
which regulates the accounting of absences for the purpose of compliance with the constitutional determination, establishes that the Chamber’s Bureau will analyze from March 5 of each year frequency report prepared by the technical area with the attendance of deputies in the previous year.
With the document in hand, the mayor designates a member of the Bureau to report any cases that can be disabled for lack, with broad defense.
That is, by these rules, the formal checking of Eduardo Bolsonaro’s absences in 2025 will only be made from March 5, 2026.
The act of table 19/2017 was recently used by the House for in April this year. The decision was based on the 2024 absences accounted for on behalf of the parliamentarian, who on charges of being one of the principals of the councilwoman’s murder (PSOL) and driver Anderson Gomes in 2018.
The regulation of the Chamber provides in its article 240 that any deputy or party may, without a defined date, provoke the Chamber’s table to declare the loss of deputy mandate for absences. It establishes, however, that this must be done “according to specific procedures established in act” and by “broad defense” of the accused.
Questioned by Sheet About at what time is the analysis of the eventual request for cassation related to absences, the press office of the House stated that this can only occur at the end of the legislative year, from December 23.
“[Nesta data] It is already possible to account for these eventual absences, whose calculation is made from the counting of the deliberative sessions in which the deputy is in the exercise of the mandate, “said the advisory, noting that the sessions are not counted for the purpose of absence if the parliamentarian is on a medical license or to deal with a particular issue.
Eduardo Bolsonaro and the family have been in the United States since the first quarter. .
Trump announced this month 50% rates against Brazil, to be implemented from August 1, alleging, among other things, a “witch hunt” against Bolsonaro. Then his government announced the prohibition of the entrance to the Moraes and his “allies in the court.”
The report was unable to contact Eduardo Bolsonaro on Thursday (24).
In recent Live, Eduardo said he will not resign his term and that if he wants to keep his term “at least until the next three months.”
The parliamentarian said on his social networks that, but has prepared for this moment and will not retreat.
PL members say they have a series of measures to be taken to maintain Eduardo Bolsonaro’s mandate.
Among the considered hypotheses is the medical license, for treatment by psychological shaking, for example. The Chamber Regiment, however, determines that the granting of this license requires a “health inspection report signed by three members of the House Medical Corps with the express indication that the patient cannot continue in the active exercise of his mandate.”
The PL also says it is intended to question regimental and formal aspects of the rules established by the House for the determination of cassation. Among other points, the classic understanding that the term “legislative session” present in the constitutional determination refers to the legislative year.
The party says it understands that the expression can mean the legislature as a whole, four years, which would considerably increase the number of absences allowed to deputies.
