According to an article, 50% rates on Brazilian products have political motivations, related to an alleged interference by the Brazilian judiciary in proceedings against allies of Jair Bolsonaro
An article published by the American newspaper “The New York Times” This Monday (28) analyzed the reaction of several countries to the commercial tariffs imposed by the government, classifying them as a “threat to sovereignty.” E, in particular, President Luiz Inacio da Silva (PT) received prominence in the publication, being pointed as an emblematic example of the tension between the protectionist policies of the and the right to self -determination of emerging nations. According to the article, 50% rates on Brazilian products, such as coffee, ore and steel, have political motivations, related to an alleged interference of the Brazilian judiciary in cases against the former president’s far right allies.
Lula has manifested himself against these tariffs, accusing the United States of using them as an instrument of political and economic pressure, challenging national sovereignty. In a statement highlighted by the New York Times, Lula stated that “Brazil will not accept intimidation.” The rhetoric of the Brazilian president has gained strength in multilateral forums, reinforcing his image as a defender of the global southern. The article suggests that verbal climbing between Brazil and the United States may affect the international commercial environment, with risk of a domino effect in other nations facing unilateral Washington measures.
The central question raised by the New York Times is whether Brazil will give in to Donald Trump’s pressures, as other nations have done, or will keep its position of defense of sovereignty, even though it is at risk of losing the US market. Currently, there are no official negotiations between Brazilian and American governments, but a meeting with US officials is expected.
*With information from Eliseu Caetano
*Report produced with the aid of AI
