A, on Tuesday (29), plays pressure on the list of left and right parliamentarians at the risk of loss of mandate in some period in the coming months.
Zambelli, (Avante-MG), (PSOL-RJ) and (PL-SP) are under threat for various reasons and with the proceeding of the respective cases also in different stages.
The most imminent risk is relative to the PL deputy, a first -time scholarshipist who was abandoned by most peers and was fugitive from Brazilian justice.
The deputy, on May 14, for invasion of the system of (National Council of Justice) and ideological falsehood.
According to the complaint of (Attorney General’s Office), Zambelli planned and commanded with hacker Walter Delgatti an invasion of the council’s institutional systems to issue fake release permits and provoke confusion in the judiciary.
Zambelli graduated from office at the end of May and, in early June. This Tuesday, she was arrested in the apartment where she lived in Rome in an action of the Brazilian Federal Police in partnership with Italian police.
The mayor, Hugo Motta (Republicans-PB), had initially said that the chamber table would approve the order of cassation immediately ,.
This Tuesday (29), the mayor wrote on his social networks that it is not up to the Chamber to deliberate on the arrest, only about the loss of the parliamentarian’s mandate.
Zambelli presented his defense on July 2. The play, signed by lawyers Fábio and Pedro Pagnozzi, argues that the conviction was based on the word of a “highly questionable credibility whistleblower” and was covered with procedural vices and defense curtailment. In addition, the lawyers pointed to political persecution.
“There is a number of parliamentarians being targeted by investigations and penalties,” says the play. “There has been a perception that any popular, often necessary mobilization is confused with the coup and violent movement. This association has led to a scenario where any more assertive position becomes the target of investigations and condemnation, often without clear distinction between the defense of ideals and adherence to illicit acts.”
Next week will be responsible for the CCJ rapporteur, oppositionist Diego Garcia (Republicans-PR), to announce his work plan, if he intends to adopt any due diligence and will comply with the defense request that Zambelli (by video conferencing), Delgatti and four witnesses are heard.
There is no deadline for this phase of instruction. After that, he still has five sessions to present his opinion. If the CCJ takes advantage of the loss of mandate, the case is released for vote in the plenary of the house, with date to be defined by Motta. For cassation, it takes the support of at least 257 of the 513 deputies, in an open vote.
Behind the scenes of the House, there are parliamentarians stating that in the name of an “internal political equilibrium”, Zambelli’s fate (the cassation or maintenance of the mandate) will be the same as the Glauber reserved, which inhabits the political field opposite to that of the parliamentary.
Glauber had (Free Brazil Movement). On the same day, only closed after Motta’s commitment to not guide the case in plenary in the first half.
Glauber said that in the case of aggression, he was exalted after the MBL militant offended his mother, who was in an advanced stage of Alzheimer’s and would die days later. He also said he was a victim of sponsored political persecution behind the scenes by former mayor Arthur Lira (PP-AL), who denies it.
Appeal of the parliamentary against the decision of the Council was rejected by the CCJ and his case is ready for voting in plenary, just by Motta to set a date.
Like Glauber, André Janones is one of the main disaffected of Bolsonarism and Centrão’s parliamentarians. Due to a confusion that was involved with oppositionists during a speech by Nikolas Ferreira (PL-MG).
Bolsonaro’s PL promises to file a new request for the revocation of his mandate due to the “cracks”.
Although Janones was acquitted by the opposition says that he confessed to the crime by making an agreement with (Attorney General’s Office) to pay R $ 131,500 to the repair of damage to and thus not being prosecuted criminally. The parliamentarian has always denied having committed irregularities.
The PL says it is certain the cancellation of Janones betting on the antipathy raised by the parliamentarian with Centrão deputies, frequent targets of his attacks. Recently, for example, he has taken a campaign on social networks against colleagues and walked around the chamber wearing a shirt with the words “People’s Enemy Congress”.
Like Janones, due to offenses against Minister Gleisi Hoffmann (institutional relations). However, there is no movement for him to be revoked after returning from the punishment.
Eduardo Bolsonaro is in the sights of the PT. The caption filed requests for cassation for breach of parliamentary decorum.
The son of has been in the US since the first quarter of the year and celebrated on social networks the fact that Donald Trump announced a 50% surcharge to Brazil, quoting as motivation, including a “witch hunt” to his father. The Supreme Federal Court (STF) has an open inquiry into its acting in the US and alleged coherences to the process that investigates the father.
Eduardo can also be revoked by absences, if he stops attending one third of the voting sessions of the year. According to the rules of the House, however,.
