On one side, a woman with her face and body covered with a black cloth. On the other, a young woman with clear eyes, long hair and shoulders. The first has in front of the PSOE and PP logos. The second, that of Vox. “What do you want?” Show the image, elaborated with artificial intelligence and that. They were placed this Wednesday and in just a few hours they unleashed the controversy. The popular ones, who hold the Mayor’s Office, have assured that their legal cabinet already studies presenting legal actions for the withdrawal of the posters and the PSOE has made a complaint before the National Police for considering them messages of hate. United Left, in addition, has transferred the situation to the prosecution because the message is “” and could constitute a crime.
The fences were placed at noon on Wednesday in two locations of. One on Oasis Avenue – which crosses the entire town – and another on El Treinta Avenue, next to the commercial area known as Due. “With this campaign denounces and fights all cultural practices that damage and denigrate women, such as forced marriage or female genital ablation,” said the formation in a statement, where he underlined his concern about the lack of measures “to stop Islamization,” as the training led by Santiago Abascal Abascal two weeks ago at a press conference held this municipality has already denounced. So, .
The images of the fences soon attract attention on social networks and, also in the parties directly mentioned. On Thursday both were covered with black tarps. Vox asserts that it was by censorship and by pressures from the company in charge of placing the announcement, something that the popular deny. “The City Council has not covered anything,” they respond from the PP. Nearby sources the company report that the company feared that the controversy splashed him and that is why he did it, but later he uncovered them and they look like this Friday.
The Consistory, where Mayor Francisco Góngora, of the Popular Party, governs with an absolute majority, issued a statement to show his rejection of the “”. “He is only interested in provocation and tension,” said the document, where it was stressed that the popular studied legal actions for the “urgent withdrawal” of the fence because, among other issues, “it harms the projection and interests of the municipality and strategic sectors for the economy such as agriculture and tourism.” The party has explained to El País that they have not yet taken any step and that its legal services are studying the case.
The PSOE, in the municipal opposition with five councilors, one less than Vox, has already denounced the two fences before the understanding that they are messages that incite hatred against migrants. For the Socialists, it implies “an incitement to social confrontation,” says the general secretary of the party in the Almeria city, Manuel Pérez Galindo, who defines Vox’s performance as “execrable” and trusts that justice “acts to purify responsibilities.” According to Pérez Galindo, these types of messages “try to create the conditions to repeat events as unfortunate as those that occurred in Torre Pacheco.” The socialist deputy Inés Plaza: “It’s pure hatred.”
This Friday, the United Left has also presented the facts to the Prosecutor’s Office, AL, the Government Subdelegation, the Crime Attention Service of Andalusia (SAVA), the City Council of El Ejido and the Action against Hate (ACO) platform. And he does it because he considers that the content is “racist, macho and xenophobic” and could constitute a crime of hatred incitement. “” They have pointed out since training. “This not only evidences a disrespect for social commitments, but also reopened wounds that we thought we were scarce,” Enrique Usez, local coordinator of the IU Assembly in the ejido insisted.
