The attempt to interfere with us in the (Supreme Court) directions that aims () must have a reverse effect and give even more evidence for the trial.
It is expected that the ministers of the First Class of the Supreme Court, responsible for the case, include in their manifest votes in and the independence of the Supreme.
The court ministers refute the possibility of softening the trial and eventual penalties of the defendants before the government’s offensive offensive and court magistrates, according to four members of the Supreme Court heard by Sheet.
They also point out that the performance of the deputy (PL-SP), the former president’s son, to gain support from the Trump government to apply sanctions against the minister and other members of the Court will be analyzed in another process.
Eduardo is the target of inquiry from suspected obstruction of justice and coercion. PF agents have maintained his publications on social networks in custody, understanding that the deputy himself produces evidence against himself.
The investigation against the deputy should not last long. The expectation in the Supreme is to prepare the receipt of any complaint against the deputy after the completion of the case about the attempted coup.
The trial against the central core of the coup plot is expected to take place in September. The process is in the final allegations phase, and the defendants’ defenses have until August 13 to speak up before the final act in the Supreme.
Four defendants’ lawyers told Sheet consider Trump’s action innocuous. They point out that the Supreme will not retreat from the process of the coup plot. One of the defenses evaluates until Bolsonaro’s legal situation can get worse, with possible increase in penalties – so now, there was no retreat of Moraes in the case.
One of the defendants of the process defendants says he believes that Trump’s growing offensive against Moraes and the Supreme Court reduces the chances of considerations in penalties or pardon.
The US movement still revive a body spirit among the ministers, especially among those of the first class, composed by Moraes, (Chairman of the Class), and Luiz Fux, sole so far to present some disagreement in relation to the rapporteur – he was against the measures imposed on Bolsonaro.
Supreme reactions to US interference in the process against Bolsonaro had different stages. The court’s first lawsuit was to authorize an investigation against Eduardo Bolsonaro when the deputy announced that he would be in the United States to seek support from the White House for sanctions against ministers of the Supreme.
When Trump’s criticism was through social networks, the ministers minimized the movement and evaluated that the statements were part of a political narrative and thus did not deserve the court’s institutional reaction.
Shortly after Trump announced the 50% surcharge on Brazilian products, which was made on Wednesday (30), Moraes decreed precautionary measures against Bolsonaro, such as the use of electronic anklet and restrictions to leave Brasilia.
The President of the Court, said, in a letter and without nominally citing the president, that the sanctions announced are founded on a “inaccurate understanding of the facts” that occurred in Brazil.
The US government climbed the crisis and applied the magnitsky law against Moraes on Wednesday (30). The legislation should be used against dictators and terrorists. She tries, in practice, to cause the accounts of her targets and the removal of the international financial system.
In this case, the Supreme tries to give an institutional response that is not interpreted as a new climb of the conflict. Barroso argues that the STF reaction must be a technical and independent judgment.
One of the signs that the judgment of the central core of the coup plot could become an act in defense of national sovereignty was the vows of the Supreme Ministers in the virtual judgment on the precautionary measures imposed on Bolsonaro.
All ministers of the First Class of the Supreme Court – EXECETO ZANIN – criticized Trump’s attempt to interfere with Bolsonaro. Until Luiz Fux, who was against the precautionary, praised the independence of the court.
“Brazilian legislation is susceptible to modification, but not disinchantic contempt, nor negotiating non -compliance with foreign government, because no authority, as well known and believed it may be, is above the law,” Moraes wrote in his vote.
“The behavior of rupture with elementary rules of action in society, which is publicly stamped, becomes even more serious when taking into account the announcement of new measures undertaken against the sovereignty of the country, the democratic rule of law and Brazilian authorities,” he added.
Flávio Dino compared Trump’s action to tax Brazil as a “sequestration of the economy” of the country. The “rescue”, in the minister’s view, would be to file the lawsuit against Bolsonaro.
“Comparative constitutional law records armed interventions against courts, magistrate cassations, court packing plan, political dissolution of cuts. But this ‘kidnapping’ will certainly deserve many academic studies, including in the United States universities, for its absolutely bold character,” he said.
