New experience with individual atoms shows that Einstein was wrong

A new MIT investigation contradicts Einstein’s idea about the duo’s experience and reinforces Niels Bohr’s theory.

In a new one, recently published in Physical Review Lettersa team of researchers from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) performed the one they consider to be the most “idealized” version of the famous Double Slit Experiencebringing new evidence that contradicts the interpretation of Albert Einstein on the foundations of quantum mechanics.

The experience of the fenda, first conducted in 1801 by Thomas Young, shows that Light behaves like a wave.

When the light crosses two cracks, a interference standard In a screen in the back, which reveals its wave character.

However, when trying to observe which slit the light passes, this pattern disappears and the light behaves like a particle. This duality between wave and particle is at the center of the perplexities of quantum physics.

Although it has made fundamental contributions to the quantum theory with the photoelectric effect, Einstein Mantinha reservations regarding their implications more radical.

The famous scientist argued that it would be possible with the right equipment, such as a screen suspended by sensitive springsdetect the path of a photon without eliminating the interference pattern.

Niels Bohrits contemporary, opposed this idea, resorting to Heisenberg’s principle of uncertainty to demonstrate that any attempt to measure would inevitably destroy wave behavior.

MIT’s new study reinforces Bohr’s position. Led by Vitaly Fedoseev and the Nobel Prize Wolfgang Ketterlethe team created a cloud of more than 10,000 Ultra -Freight Atomsclose to the absolute zero, organized in a crystalline structure through lasers.

In this configuration, the light passing between pairs of atoms replicated the passage of a photon through two tiny cracks – the smallest ever used, explains the.

Essentially, scientists could adjust the degree of confinement of atoms. When they were less arrested, became more “diffuse” and sensitive to interaction with light, which led to the destruction of the interference pattern – just as quantum mechanics predict.

“What we have done can be seen as a New Variant of Experience From the duo slit, ”Ketterle explains in a statement published in.“ These individual atoms act as the smallest slits that can be built. ”

“The important It is not the springs, as Einstein suggestedbut a ‘fuzziness‘ – The diffuse quantum uncertainty of atoms, ”added Fedoseev.“ A deeper model is needed, which takes the quantum correlations between photons and atoms. ”

In recent years, new studies have shown that Einstein was wrong; Others, more often, that was right. And one even showed that the famous German physicist – in the good way of quantum mechanics.