The decision that expanded the scholarship pressure on the congressional summit, which, for the time being, shows a willingness to resist the requirement of blunt measures against the Supreme Court (STF) and Minister Alexandre de Moraes.
In the court itself, on the other hand, the measure generated indignation of part of the magistrates. Amid increasing tensions, the Planalto Palace.
The backstage reaction in the summit of the three powers occurred under the impact of the noise caused by Bolsonarists in the House and in and, as usually occurs in this type of situation, can change with the unfolding of events.
In the Supreme Court, the dissatisfaction of part of the ministers with the decision of Moraes occurred on the grounds that the situation touches the political scenario at an inappropriate time.
According to the Monica Bergamo column, the arrest warrant left the minister isolated in the court, and the bet between members of the Supreme is that he could reconsider the determination.
Nevertheless, in the assessment of ministers heard by the report, there is majority in the first class to support their decision.
They claim that the arrest has damaged Bolsonaro’s allies movement to look for court ministers to suggest agreements in search of appeasement, given the proximity of the trial of the coup plot.
Moraes supporters, on the other hand, argue that Bolsonaro’s arrest became essential in the face of a series of measures by the former president and his son Eduardo, who would indicate an attempt to coerce the Supreme, with the aid of the government and the instigation of his supporters against the court.
In the Legislature, the presidents of the Senate, (Union-AP), and the House, (-PB), for more drastic measures against the Supreme Court.
Allies of the former Mandator occupied the table of the plenary of the House and Senate, preventing the sessions, which generated chatting and threats on both sides, on a climb of tensions intensified a few weeks ago, since Moraes adopted restrictive measures against the former president, such as the use of an anklet.
Alcolumbre, which also chairs the, classified as arbitrary to. Motta stated that he will act so that the interests of the population are not in the background.
“The occupation of the directors of the houses, which makes their operation unfeasible, constitutes arbitrary exercise of their own reasons, something unusual and alien to democratic principles,” Alcolumbre said in a statement.
Senator Flávio Bolsonaro (-RJ) criticized the attitude of the president of the house. “Note very bad. I think David shouldn’t treat us in the opposition in a humiliating way as it is treating us.”
Motta, in turn, reaffirmed that the chamber’s voting agenda is defined by him along with the leaders of the parties and argued that the interests of the population are not in second place.
Dething from the public position of Centrão Cardinals, the former mayor, Arthur Lira (PP-AP) went to social networks to speak critically to Moraes’ decision.
“Brazil needs to treat its former presidents better. I have said and defended this for a long time. The measures applied to Jair Bolsonaro are exaggerated and acign the spirits in an already polarized country that, in fact, needs peace and stability to progress,” the parliamentarian posted on his social networks.
“When the environment is of legal insecurity and political instability, the economy suffers. Who pays this account is the people. Who loses is Brazil.”
On the government side, the orientation was to adopt caution not to feed victimization and political persecution against Bolsonaro, and avoid escalating the indisposition with the Trump government amid the implementation of 50% surcharge on Brazilian products.
This was the recommendation given by the Minister of Secom (Secretariat of Social Communication) of the Presidency,, colleagues in the Esplanada and whom he sought him in search of guidance.
He said, during an event on Tuesday, that he did not want to talk about.
“I think today is a day of giving good news. I came committed not to talk much about the taxation, but I have to talk because too, if I don’t talk, you will say, ‘Why didn’t Lula say? Trump’s fear?’. I don’t want to talk to what happened to that other citizen, who tried to scam … I want to talk about the country,” he said.
According to members of the Planalto, any movement to explore prison should be restricted to the militancy and the “factory floor” of Congress.
In the House, for example, PT deputies and other leftist parties confronted pockets who obstructed legislative work.
Among other points, the left says that the protest that aims to benefit Bolsonaro may undermine projects such as raising income tax exemption and the assistance package to sectors of the economy affected by Trump’s tariff.
“Are they going to retaliate the Brazilian people? Because what is in voting there are projects of interest to the Brazilian population. Exemption for those who earn up to $ 5,000 and the decrease in tax burden for those who earn up to $ 7,000. They will obstruct harming the Brazilian people?”
