After meeting of leaders, Senate president said he will not accept external pressures to advance the agenda
The president of the Senate, (Union-AP), said on Wednesday (6.ago.2025) that will not guide the requests for impeachment of the Minister of the Supreme Court (STF) Alexandre de Moraes. The statement was made after meeting with party leaders, amid.
According to the Senators (PSB-CE) and (PT-AP), alcohumbre ensured that it will not put the requests for impeachment of STF ministers on agenda.
Alcolumbre said the decision on advancing with lawsuits against ministers of the Court is exclusively the presidency of the Senate – and that he will not accept external pressures for this.
Cid classified as “attack on democracy” the occupation. He stated that alcohumbre will no longer tolerate this type of action. The expectation, according to him, is that the plenary will be vacated until Monday (11.ago.2025) so that the operation of the Senate is resumed.
Alcolumbre also announced semi -presential this Thursday (7.ago.2025), at 11am, to analyze guidelines fought by obstruction in the House and Senate.
One of them is a project that maintains exemption to go to those who earn up to 2 minimum wages (PL).
“Parliament will not be hostage to actions aimed at destabilizing its operation. We will continue to vote on matters of interest to the population. Democracy is done with dialogue, but also with responsibility and firmness.”said about the obstruction.
In addition, the Senate table should discuss the situation of Senator Marcos do Val (Somos-ES), the target of precautionary STF measures.
The impeachment of STF ministers is up to the president of the house. So far, Moraes accumulates 30 requests.
Data compiled by the site “votessenators.com.br” show that 40 senators of the impeachment of Alexandre de Moraes. Another 19 are against and 22 do not have a defined position. Favorable votes of 2/3 of the Plenary are required to confirm the dismissal.
In addition to impeachment requests against Moraes, the opposition calls for an analysis of the end of the privileged forum and the amnesty to those involved in the scammer acts of 8 January.
