Judge Juan Carlos Peinado, who has been charged with Begoña Gómez for more than a year, has parked in “this moment” his attempts to investigate the alleged relationship between Pedro Sánchez’s wife and the rescue of Air Europa in the middle of Coronavirus pandemic. In a resolution dated Tuesday – with which he refuses to declare the commissioner Víctor de Aldama () -, the magistrate admits that the Provincial Court of Madrid has ordered to close this line of investigation in the absence of indications, but hairstyle opens the door to be resumed and, in fact, indicates what movements could do Motu proprio the businessman to value that possibility.
The rescue of Air Europa has been one of the great obsessions of the judge in his cause against Gomez. The Madrid audience of the investigations because it was based on mere “conjectures.” “These facts are excluded from this procedure,” he reiterated for the last time on May 13. The court had to repeat it because hairstyle made a deaf ear and continued with its inquiries, to notice that this path had been vetoed by a higher instance.
In his recent resolution on Thursday, to which the country had access, Peinado acknowledges that the audience closed that door and, therefore, refuses to quote Aldama, as the ultra -Catholic group asked to hear on the basis of an interview where the commissioner said that “Begoña Gómez was already pressing from the Moncloa so that the rescue would occur”. According to the judge, those words (where he addresses the issue “tangential”) are not enough to resume the matter. But, then, the magistrate adds that the Provincial Court foresaw that the rescue can be investigated if “new facts appear” that are indications of crime; and indicates how it could be achieved that it is valued to reopen that line of the investigations.
“That Aldama, in an interview with a means of communication, refers tangentially to that rescue, even if it were to relate it to hypothetical benefits for the chair of digital transformation, whose co -director is the investigated, does not involve per se […] The existence of new facts, ”explains combing on the requirement imposed by the hearing, before riveting:” Different issue would be that, as it is supposed to affirm in the aforementioned interview, it is willing to inform a certain judicial body. “
In this sense, the magistrate affects that the commissioner can ask Motu proprio appear before the Central Court of Instruction 5 of the National Court, which keeps him accused, to express “what he deems appropriate.” In this way, the person in charge of that court, Santiago Pedraz, could deduce testimony and send it to hairstyle. Another option, it emphasizes, is that Aldama goes to a “public feeder” to declare what he considers and then these statements are “provided” to “value them.” “And, in that case, the decision that is deemed appropriate would be adopted,” he adds hairstyle.
