PT leader in the House, Lindbergh Farias (RJ), has been positioned against the end of the special forum, a theme that in the house. But in 2018, the petista defended the restriction of this prerogative to all public office. At the time, he was a senator.
“I find it a great initiative,” the parliamentarian told the news agency that year, referring to one) about limiting the scope of the special forum to all protected public careers.
The Supreme had decided, a week earlier, to limit the application of the special forum, but only for senators and deputies. From then on, only crimes committed during the mandate or by virtue of the civil service would be tried in the court.
Wanted, Lindbergh said to Sheet which would defend the end of the privileged forum under normal conditions, but that the current context is “completely different” from 2018 and the project under discussion is not the same.
“They want to use as a kind of amnesty for deputies,” he said. “They do this during Bolsonaro’s trial to prevent it from having inquiry, investigation and trial of deputies.”
With the charges for crimes committed by deputies and senators outside the mandate began to be assessed in ordinary courts, starting at the first instance. In his interview with the Senate agency, Lindbergh argued that the rule be applied to all public positions protected by the forum, not just those of parliamentarians.
“Because in fact I couldn’t do something that is here [Parlamento] and members of the judiciary and various other institutions [com foro] would be out, “said Lindbergh.” So it’s important to end this way, for everyone [os cargos públicos protegidos]. I think it’s a hit. “
Today the end of the special forum is one of the measures defended by Bolsonarist parliamentarians and centrão within the presented after the riot that occupied the House and Senate tables for about 30 hours.
Led by Lindbergh, the PT bench in the House, opposes the measure. “We are against this forum PEC, because it is born in the worst possible way, in a spurious negotiation, in the hidden, the result of the pressure of those who made blackout, to ensure impunity,” wrote the deputy in post at the X, last Friday (8).
“It is an alliance between desperate scholarships and a train of joy to protect deputies,” he added.
After the meeting of the college of leaders on Tuesday (12), which ended without consensus to guide the end of the special forum, Lindbergh celebrated. “Those who did it all could not be awarded by choosing the parliament’s agenda. For us, it was important, because again does not enter amnesty and will not enter. And the discussion of the forum did not enter either. The blackmail was not imposed today.”
The current minister of the Secretariat of Institutional Relations, (PT-PR), was also opposed to the privileged forum during the discussions headed by the STF from 2017. She pondered at the time, however, that the measure would need to be discussed by parliamentarians, not the supreme.
“The STF needs to stop legislating. I know the times are difficult, but we need to do it correctly,” he told the press, according to the Gazeta do Povo newspaper.
In the same line was the current government leader in Congress, Senator (PT-AP), who argued to end the special forum. “The forum has to be extinguished, and who has to do this is the.”
Speaking sent to the Platoter Portal and published on Monday (11), Randolfe says he maintains his position, but criticizes the current mobilization by the end of the forum.
“They want the [fim do] Privileged forum for personal protection, “he said.” The use of the forum for convenience by circumstance. Today, I think the same about the privileged forum. No parliamentary instrument should serve to protect the parliamentary. It’s the same conviction I had earlier. The forum cannot serve as a crime protection instrument. “
Gift Link: Did you like this text? Subscriber can release seven free hits from any link per day. Just click on F Blue below.
