The movements around the fate of the and last week leave a scent of shell in the air.
There is a regimental basis to send the cases directly to the ethics advice of the two houses, as well as there are plenty of records of images to document what went far beyond the breach of decorum.
Still, of the rebellious senators nothing is said and about the amotinated deputies what is provided is one in the decision about the type of punishment to be applied to them.
It opens one as if something has yet to be investigated about the incident. In the Senate, there was only greater discretion due to the President’s maneuver (Union-AP) to avoid exposing himself to the offenders’ safen, but the criminal action was also present there.
In the House, the deputies left no doubt about the intention of applying a blow to the President (Republicans-PB), preventing him from taking command of the session on that dark Wednesday (6).
It is no longer a question of arguing how weakened the episode or whether or not it can recover its authority. What is at stake is the reputation of the legislature and its ability to preserve its own institutional essence.
The powerful Congress of these current and very strange times will be combined with this story, if the signs are materialized that a nullity or even lightness in the application of concealers is underway.
It will be clear that the group of Parliament took advantage of the situation to carry out the ideas of taking deputies and senators of the jurisdiction of the Federal Supreme Court and to return to action against them to the approval of the congressmen. A return to the rule of impunity extinguished in 2001.
If so, the House of Laws will tell society that it accepts the conviviality with insubordination to the rules, a factor incompatible with the constitution to which everyone has sworn to submit.
Gift Link: Did you like this text? Subscriber can release seven free hits from any link per day. Just click on F Blue below.
