Centrão and opposition parliamentarians say that the commotion caused by the, which deals with, should not boost the debate on the regulation of networks.
The Government (PT) wants rules for the functioning of the Big Techs – but it has gained traction in recent weeks in the face of the sanctions imposed on Brazil by the President of ,.
Petista’s allies say the video generated a political opportunity to move on with the theme, which had come out of the congressmen’s radar in the face of the resistance of pockets and the strong lobby of technology companies.
Lula assistants say that they need to explore what they classify as a contradiction of opposition, which advocates the protection of children in the digital environment while rejecting any regulation of these companies.
In addition to adopting standards for the protection of children and adolescents, the government evaluates wide proposals for Big Techs, which include the creation of a surveillance structure. At least two minutes are under discussion at the Planalto Palace: one formulated by the Ministry of Justice and Public Security e.
O and met with eight ministers on Wednesday (13) to address the subject.
“He [Donald Trump] He said he will not accept us to regulate his big techs, but we will regulate, because to be in Brazil has to be regulated, “said the petista after the meeting.” There is only one way for a company not wanting to be regulated in Brazil: not being in Brazil. “
After the meeting, the minister of the Secretariat of Institutional Relations, said that proposals were closed that “seek to increase the protection of Brazilian citizens in the digital environment and promote economic competition”.
“We will discuss the theme with the National Congress to respond to the demand of the Brazilian population because I impose more responsibility for digital platforms to ensure a safe digital environment,” he wrote on a social network.
In the publication, the minister said that the government supports a bill that deals with the protection of children and adolescents in digital environments that has already been approved in and processed today in the House.
The project is reported by. Members of the Executive praised the opinion presented by him and now work, with the parliamentarians, so that the theme is voted as soon as possible. Next week.
According to government members, the minister’s post is an attempt to placate congressional reactions, removing the suspicion of usurpation of power of parliamentarians.
Despite the priority given to the theme by the government after Felca’s video, Centrão deputies claim that the possibility of regulating networks to advance Congress today is considered null.
Allies of the mayor, (-PB), there are no political climate to discuss topics that divide the Plenary of the House, still in the context of the tension generated by the former president (PL).
Three leaders close to Motta stated, under reserve, that his reaction should be limited to the “adultization” of children – not being clear what this means in practice.
The Senator (Republicans-DF), former Bolsonaro minister, charged the House, for example, the approval of a bill that increases the penalty for pedophiles.
“I’ve even sent a message to President Hugo: ‘President, the best bill is this one, which increases the penalty,'” said the senator.
“What I will not allow is that, using children, torture, horror, suicide, bullying, exploitation, someone now appears as a childhood advocate and send to the National Congress a proposal to regulate the networks,” he said.
The mayor determined the creation of a general commission to discuss the sexualization of children and adolescents in the networks next Wednesday (20).
From then on, the idea is that a working group will be created to analyze other proposals that deal with it – in the last two days, with the aim of combating improper exposure, sexual exploitation and other crimes against children and adolescents on the internet.
Motta’s allies argue that topics that discuss the digital environment are dealt with separately, precisely to prevent political polarization from contaminating the process of defending children and adolescents.
And cite as an example the regulation of artificial intelligence, which is being discussed in a commission in the House. The collegiate deputies must present a text on the subject in November, to be approved later this year in the House plenary.
In the Senate, the theme ended in the background this week in front of a row of pending issues, such as sabbath of the nominees for higher courts and regulatory agencies.
Damares and Senator Jaime Bagattoli (PL-RO) collected signatures to the subject, but cardinals claim in reservedly that the priority should be the approval of proposals that may have some practical unfolding.
