Days ago, one of these extraordinary viralizations dominated the Brazilian. This time the video did not serve to misinform and disseminate hatred and fear. He made intelligent and objective complaint from the highest public interest – the protection of childhood.
Felca, the producer of the video, said formative mechanisms of pedophile communities on the networks. Playing adultization, sexualization and exploitation of children is profitable practice for companies such as Instagram ,, or. And facilitated by your algorithms.
Just as white supremacists use “dog whistles”, ciphered codes for group communication, pedophiles use dick bottle whistles. The word “trade” in the comments section is one of them. When they write “trade”, pedophiles communicate intention to trade intimate image of children, relax and enjoy. Big techs are able to curb but let roll.
The reactions on the agenda of Congress and the Government were immediate. Bill and working group appeared. In the coming days we should watch a choreography of good intentions and cosmetic adjustments of the nets themselves. Given the risk of state regulation shaped in the public interest, they must announce cosmetic measure of private self -regulation.
Outraged manifestations crossed the political spectrum from right to left, but indicated symptomatic divergence. While one side speaks of moral decay, good customs and punishment of depraved, another emphasizes promotion and protection of rights, prevention of abuse and regulation of digital environments that become sexual exploitation.
For one, moral and legal responsibility is libertine individuals who molest children. There is no responsibility for the company that refuses to apply simple devices to prevent violation.
For another, there is not only business complicity, but intentionality. More profitable than preventing it is to let the crime flow in wholesale and defend the redeeming punishment of half a dozen retail sexual predators.
One prefers to concentrate the outraged look at the pedophile and hide the child erotization playground built by Big Techs. The same one who looks at the addicted gambler and pretends not to see the role of Bets in the economy of inoculation of addiction. The other allows himself to look beyond the pedophile and see the manager of the profitable playground of sexual crime.
For one, children must be protected exclusively by parents, without constitutional regulatory intervention. For others, the delegation of absolute family power to parents makes children more vulnerable. Without public policy of school sex education, the house itself becomes an environment released from abuse. And also the Instagram profile of parents.
For one, any regulation is censorship, even if you protect children. For another, regulation must promote rights in general and the right to freedom of expression.
It is not difficult to know which side seeks to test structural measures, face the risk of error and find the solution. It is not difficult to see which side, while shouting “fire in the pedophiles”, whether the freedom of pedophile freedom piped by the pedophile instigation algorithm.
Gift Link: Did you like this text? Subscriber can release seven free hits from any link per day. Just click on F Blue below.
