The Central Bank Auditors’ ANBCB (ANBCB) issued a statement in which it sees contradiction in the fact that the Lula government did not have an amendment that shields external interference.
The tool was the target of attacks by the US President, who against Brazil citing, among other things, “electronic payment services developed by the government.”
The rapporteur of the proposal at the CCJ (Constitution and Justice Commission) of the Senate, Plínio Valério (PSDB-AM), incorporated his opinion in which he states that it is the exclusive competence of the BC the regulation and operation of the Pix and in which it should be observed some points, such as free use by individuals and non-discriminatory access to services and infrastructure necessary for its operation, among others.
There was an articulation at the CCJ for this stretch to be presented as an amendment by the government leader, Jaques Wagner (PT-BA), which did not occur.
“The idea of this constitutional protection arose amid the PIX government campaign in response to the investigation opened by US President Donald Trump,” the association says.
“Such incompatibility between discourse and practice endangers the preservation of one of the most relevant recent advances in the country’s financial system,” he says
Valério states that Wagner had signaled him that he had agreed with the amendment and that at no time did he oppose resistance. However, the government leader did not return to the device. Wagner took medical license to perform orthopedic surgery.
Gift Link: Did you like this text? Subscriber can release seven free hits from any link per day. Just click on F Blue below.
