of 2026 insist on responsible President Luiz Inácio da Silva (PT) for the crisis with the.
It is the comfortable way they found to distance themselves from the pockets. Mental dishonesty in the construction of versions is nonetheless an inalienable right of its authors, although the trick actually finds a powerful obstacle.
True, it would not have to have contaminated the relationship between the two countries with the childhood disease of anti -Americanism. More consistent with the diplomatic tradition of Brazil would have been to maintain the tradition of neutrality, but it is done and, by the way, will not change.
In addition, the offensive of not only reached ideological adversaries. Reached politically friendly governments like a. Therefore, Lula’s positions may even compose the scene, but they do not serve as justification or explain the whole so far without reasonable explanation.
The governors of Sao Paulo, Paraná, Minas Gerais and Goiás are certainly not affected by an outbreak of amnesia. They should remember very well with the treatment that the then government of (), supported by them, reserved, just as for ideological reasons.
Brazil’s largest commercial partner, at the time seen as a communist threat, was the target of offensive statements, aggressive rhetoric and even guilty of
In protest, the Chinese embassy reacted with energy, but it nevertheless damaged the export agenda nor tried to intervene in our internal issues or apply sanctions to people whose acts displeased Beijing.
Electoral pretensions do not authorize anyone to distort the facts to shape them to their conveniences. In this case, what we have is the figure of an aggressor who decided to trigger his punishment plant to wings to his own violence. A disease that a call from Lula does not heal.
Gift Link: Did you like this text? Subscriber can release seven free hits from any link per day. Just click on F Blue below.