Since the house arrest was decreed by the Minister of (Supreme Federal Court) Alexandre de Moraes, the National Congress is under strong pressure. On Tuesday (5), began a promoted by parliamentarians Bolsonarists in the House of Representatives and in the Senate with the objective of guiding amnesty to the convicts of the attacks of. Hugo Motta (Republicans-PB), mayor, was very attacked as to the fragility of his leadership. .
In the monitoring of, which analyzes more than 100,000 public groups of WhatsApp and Telegram in real time, the pressure had a well -established strategy. The addressing of the messages was in accordance with the agenda in question, targeting the issue of amnesty, and pressing (União Brasil-AP) to guide the impeachment of. The messages, in both cases, concentrated during the night, with reinforcements in the late morning, and shared command verbs and explicit calls to the action.
The pressure increased over the past week due to the enormous repercussion of those, which raised the debate about children’s adultization on social networks. The theme, which was already being discussed by the congressmen, causing Hugo Motta to recognize the urgency of the agenda and announce that he would put to vote on the authorship of the. In an interview with GloboNews, Motta stated that the text, which has passed the Senate, should be voted in the House later this week.
In the ideological field, the right uses the theme as a moral flag and is divided between those who advocate harsh rules and who rejects “regulating the internet” for fear of censorship. Opposition parliamentarians have stated that if they identify any sign of censorship they will obstruct the “adultization” PL vote, as the bill is being called. In the leftist groups, pressing on the liability of the platforms.
Already in the matter of impeachment of Moraes, the flow of pressure migrates to OE the messages gain an accusatory connotation. This is also the discussion in which an identity deviation was observed: part of the mentions incorporates references to the fact that David Alcolumbre is a Jew. In the X (former Twitter), messages associated with the Senate president question the integrity of the Jewish people as a whole.
From the institutional point of view, the difference in treatment between the presidents of the houses is clear. Hugo Motta receives procedural and policies associated with amnesty policies while David Alcolumbre receives charges to guide impeachment and faces attacks of personal and anti -Semitic nature, which turn part of the pressure into identity dispute.
This contrast in the treatment is mainly due to the firmer positioning of alcohumbre by stating that it will not guide that of Moraes ,. The low possibility of opposition success shifts the battle of the political field to personal attacks.
The pressure on that observed on social networks and messenger groups makes the behavior of pocket parliamentarians no different, as acting non -equivalent would be subject to the scrutiny of the base in next year’s elections. The pocket pressure, therefore, should remain strong, coming from both nets and parliamentarians.
Gift Link: Did you like this text? Subscriber can release seven free hits from any link per day. Just click on F Blue below.
