The dialogues of with their son Eduardo and Pastor Silas Malafaia revealed by the hard to have great impact on the former president’s trial by the coup plot in the Federal Supreme Court, since there has been a long-term feeling played with a heavy conviction.
In this sense, one of the former president in closed regime would only anticipate a predictable consequence.
The true effect of conversation exposure is different, and not least to Bolsonaro: their political and personal demoralization.
Reading the messages is an experience that can be done to the Freudian light of a turbulent relationship between father and son or by the psychological control exercised by a religious leader about an cornered figure. In none of the situations, Bolsonaro does well.
The tough character and system contesting suffers deep scratches in his image. It has everything to become one more sticking to the former president as one day were “I was a weakened” or “so?” I don’t gray. “
Malafaia, in turn, emerges as a much more relevant actor than imagined in the strategy of the attack on the Supreme, in what is one of the great revelations of the messages. It is clear that the pastor is much more than a mere organizer of acts on Paulista Avenue.
“The conversations indicate that Silas Malafaia acts directly in the definition of actions planned by the investigated group whose purpose is to coercive judicial authorities of the Supreme Court (),” the report summarizes.
Not by chance, he has shocks with Eduardo, as if the two disputed the leader’s estate in his political sunset.
It is the pastor who insists on the thesis to more directly link Donald Trump’s tariff to Amnesty to Bolsonaro. “‘You have to join the rate with the issue of amnesty. Or combine freedom, justice and amnesty and the fall of the fee,” he says in one of the messages to the former president.
The concern is also with form. During the marketer’s stuntman, he asks Bolsonaro to manifest not by text, but always by video, because it is “only what viralizes”. It also gives frequent spurs to the former president, in its usual acid style, and is not contested (at least in the messages revealed).
Bolsonaro’s demoralization is completed with the much larger emphasis on amnesty to himself, to the detriment of forgiveness to the January 8 prisoners, treated almost as a footnote. And proceed with the extraordinary document contrary to numerous statements that he would never escape from the country.
All added, Bolsonaro emerges as a diminished figure, with the project of martyrifying before severely shaken public opinion. There are obvious impacts on the future of what is still conventionally called pockets.
Bolsonaro looks like someone who loses much of the political condition of influencing the 2026 election, as the center-right governors already demonstrate who put their heads out of his default.
The spotlight turns to Tarcísio de Freitas, the target of Eduardo Bolsonaro’s fury and occasionally Malafaia as well.
The ones no longer allow to disguise the deep ideological crack of the right.
The governor of São Paulo, from now on, will have to once again exercise his equilibrium skills to make the center of the center without losing the former president’s seal, if he really wants to risk a presidential candidacy.
The task, however, became more complicated, as it is hard to imagine a jair and weakened jair giving the blessing of Tarcisio’s candidacy against the will of his exile.
In this case they matter less, the governor’s meetings with Faria Lima, the evangelicals or the cheese singers. Faced with such confusion, the safe haven of the reelection candidacy becomes quite tempting for the occupant of the Bandeirantes Palace.