Former President () and (PL-SP) used the accounts of their wives in transactions to avoid resource blockages ,.
Investigators also claim that Eduardo made two transfers to Heloísa Bolsonaro “as a way to conceal” the values previously sent to him by his father. The former president transferred at least $ 2 million to her son in May, and previously made six transfers for Pix to Eduardo who total $ 110,000.
Bolsonaro also transferred $ 2 million to June 4, a day before giving testimony to the PF. He did not say investigators about Pix transfers to Eduardo and the transfer to Michelle, says the PF.
Financial movements were cited in the report in which (PL-SP) on suspicion of obstruction of the trial of the coup plot, underway in the (Federal Supreme Court).
For the PF, the analysis of transactions points out that Jair and Eduardo used “various devices to conceal the origin and destination of financial resources, with the purpose of financing and supporting the activities of an illicit nature of the licensed parliamentary abroad”.
Investigators also claim that the former president has acted since the beginning of 2025 to get rid of his resources to avoid possible judicial measures that would prevent him from financially supporting Eduardo Bolsonaro.
The PF also tells that, after receiving R $ 2 million from his father, Eduardo Bolsonaro did a unilateral availability exchange operation, in the amount of R $ 1,661,835.76, to the United States. He informed the broker that the value originated in the transaction made by his father.
In a statement to the police, Bolsonaro said the transfers to Eduardo were fueled by donation campaigns made by supporters of the former president.
The investigation also states that from January to July 2025 Bolsonaro carried out 40 transactions, including withdrawals in ATMs and face -to -face service in bank window.
“In total, R $ 130,800.00 were accounted for. The former president is not ignored to make small expenses, especially during travel and trips made along public agendas. However, the large volume of physical cash transactions is a relevant evidence in the probative context, considering the risks associated with the lack of traceability and the possibility of financing illicit actions,” said PF.
