A can analyze on Wednesday (20) measures to shield deputies of what they consider interference of the judiciary. The president of the House, (-PB), designated a rapporteur for the so-called PEC of armor, or PEC of prerogatives, and the vote can be included in the agenda of the day.
Deputy Lafayette Andrada (Republicans-MG) was invited by Motta to report the proposal last Monday (18) and works in suggestions for the project.
One of the options considered is to restore the original text of the 1988 Constitution, which provided for the need for authorization from the legislature to be investigated and tried for common crimes. A, when the Congress itself reverses the forecast that now intends to resume.
The theme was discussed during a dinner on Tuesday (19) that united presidents of right and center governors and governors, such as PP, União Brasil, Republicans, PSD and MDB. The governor of, (Republicans), for example, defended the so -called parliamentary prerogatives. It is regarded as the main opposition name to compete against (PT) in 2026.
The discussion about the armor, which matters not only to the pockets, but mainly to Centrão, in the first week of August.
To end the riot, the stands of the and the new announced that they had the adhesion of other parties, such as PP and União Brasil, to vote, first, the armor and the end of the forum and then the amnesty, with the intention of benefiting (PL), defendant in the (Supreme Court) accused of leading a coup plot. The agreement, however, was disallowed by Motta.
Coping with the Supreme Court is a sensitive issue for many Centrão deputies.
After the riot, the mayor began to signal that the end of the forum and the amnesty had no majority in the house and therefore would not be taken to the plenary. Already the shield, on the other hand, last week.
At the meeting of party leaders on Tuesday, when the agenda of the week was discussed, there was no consensus about the armor, which was defended by União Brasil, PP, Novo and PL. Deputies on the left admitted that the theme is relevant, but that voting it at this time would only steady the climate between Congress and the Supreme Court.
