() received about R $ 30 million in his bank accounts between March 2023 and February 2024, points out the analysis of the attachment to the investigation over them, which led to the indictment of the former president and his son (PL-SP).
The analysis is based on information raised by the Coaf (Financial Activities Control Council).
The agency says that there are suspicions of evidence of money laundering and other criminal offenses by the former president and Eduardo.
Sought, the defense did not comment on the analysis of the PF. Regarding the indictment, he stated on the morning of Thursday (21) that “there was never the breach of any previously imposed precautionary measure” by the Supreme Court (STF).
Already Eduardo called, in a note on Wednesday night (20), “absolutely delirious crime” the notes of the PF that resulted in the indictment.
According to PF’s analysis, Bolsonaro was identified as a part involved in communications reported by Coaf Financial Intelligence Units.
Also according to the text, financial operations with suspected “money laundering and other illicit” in Bolsonaro accounts occurred between March 1, 2023 and June 5, 2025. Between March 1, 2023 and February 7, 2024, R $ 30,576,801.36 in credits and R $ 30,595,430.71 in debts in these accounts.
The document records the receipt, via Pix, of R $ 19.3 million, at 1,214,254 releases in the period – which represents more than 60% of the amount received by Bolsonaro. In mid -2023, allies made one for Bolsonaro to pay fines and lawyers, which generated a wave of donations for Pix. The PF report only reports the receipts but does not mention the campaign.
The PL, the former president’s party, appears as the main payer in the period, with $ 291,000 transferred to Bolsonaro. The biggest expenses were made to their lawyers, in the amount of R $ 6.8 million.
The PF states that 50 financial operations communications were analyzed involving people related to coup plot investigations. Of these communications, four deal with suspicions related to Bolsonaro, and four, Eduardo Bolsonaro.
Other transactions made by the former president and his son were also analyzed. The investigation document cites, for example, that Bolsonaro transferred R $ 2 million to Eduardo on May 13, 2025, as reported by the president himself in a statement. However, he also states that $ 30,000 were sent in March and $ 40,000 in April, when Eduardo was already in the US – according to the text, he arrived in the country on February 27.
Regarding Bolsonaro, the PF says it “draws attention to the volume of exchange operations carried out over the analyzed period, which totaled R $ 105,905.54, especially considering that the former president has the passport withheld and forbidden to leave the country.”
Police analysis also highlights the transfer of R $ 2 million of Bolsonaro to former first lady Michelle Bolsonaro on June 4 this year, a day before he gave testimony in the investigation. The PF understands that he made the transfer to his wife’s account.
The PF report that supported the indictment says that Eduardo also used his wife to avoid blockages of resources.
According to the investigation, the deputy made two transfers to Heloísa Bolsonaro “as a way to conceal” the values previously sent to him by his father.
For the PF, the analysis of transactions points out that Bolsonaro and Eduardo used “various devices to conceal the origin and destination of financial resources, with the purpose of financing and supporting the activities of an illicit nature of the licensed parliamentarian abroad”.
In a statement to the police, Bolsonaro said the transfers to Eduardo were fueled by donation campaigns made by supporters of the former president.
The investigation also states that Bolsonaro carried out 40 transactions from January to July 2025, including withdrawals in ATMs and face -to -face service in bank window.
“In total, R $ 130,800.00 were accounted for. The former president is not ignored to make small expenses, especially during travel and trips made along public agendas. However, the large volume of physical cash transactions is a relevant evidence in the probative context, considering the risks associated with the lack of traceability and the possibility of financing illicit actions,” said PF.
