Included it in its alleged coercion of () and his son Eduardo Dialogues unrelated to the crimes investigated.
In addition, part of the material made public on Wednesday (20) by (Supreme Federal Court) shows divergences on, exposing political articulations of the group.
The inquiry in which Bolsonaro and Eduardo were indicted investigates the possible practice of the crimes of coercion and abolition of the Democratic Rule of Law.
Allies of the former president criticized the fact that the investigation report was sent to the Supreme on the eve of the trial on the coup plot. The president of the first class, minister, marked on September 2 the beginning of the analysis of the central core of the action.
The conversations in the PF report were obtained from a Bolsonaro cell phone. These are messages exchanged between the former president and Eduardo, the pastor of the Assembly of God and the American lawyer Martin de Luca.
The report exposes one and the governor of, (Republicans), in the early days after the announcement of Donald Trump’s tariff against Brazil.
In a message sent to his father, Eduardo states that Tarcisio never helped him in the Supreme, despite the good traffic among the ministers. “It has always been a cross -arm watching you fuck yourself and warm up to 2026,” he wrote.
Another message shows an offense from Eduardo to the father because of Tarcisio.
In an interview with the Power 360 days before the deputy’s messages, Bolsonaro had said that Tarcisio was still “my younger brother” and praised his work ahead of the São Paulo government. Following, he said that Eduardo, “despite being 40 years old now, he is not that mature.”
Eduardo reacted angrily., He wrote in capital letters, using the acronym that means “will take it in C …”.
“I was going to set aside the history of Tarcisio, but grace to the compliments you made to me in power 360 I am seriously thinking about giving one more punch in it, to see if you learn,” said Eduardo.
The Federal Police included in the final report on Bolsonaro’s cell phone. Most were extracted from WhatsApp conversations between former President and Silas Malafaia.
In one of the 12 -second audios, the president says he could not record a video that the pastor asked him because he had a crisis of sobs. “Malafaia, I have a hiccup crisis. Every three seconds is a hiccup crisis. It’s impossible to record anything. And this crisis has been with me for days, ok? If you calm here I do,” says Bolsonaro in the recording.
The professor of criminal law at UERJ (Rio de Janeiro State University) David Tangerino says that the inclusion of personal conversations unmarked with the crimes investigated is a common practice in the lower instances.
President Lula himself (PT) had a dialogue without relation to the investigations, revealed after the exposure of staples by then judge Sergio Moro. At the time, the petista asked former minister Paulo Vannuchi where the “hard greens of our party were.” The defense of the petista also asked the court compensation for the exposure of private dialogue between Marisa Letícia and her son.
“Brazil is missing in Brazil an express norm determining that everything that is not relevant should not be materialized in the case, should be pure and simply discarded,” says Tangerino, who argues that the regulation is approved by Congress in a project about.
He estimates that the report on Bolsonaro and Eduardo has excesses in the reproductions of conversations. “The part over Tarcisio has nothing to do with the process. Malafaia fighting with Eduardo as well,” he adds.
Tangerino also states that the disclosure of the report on the eve of Bolsonaro’s judgment in the Supreme is not an out of the curve because the processes reported by the minister have been faster than common.
USP Gustavo Badaró’s Professor of Criminal Procedural Law also points out excesses in the dissemination of messages. The teacher on the right of defense for the final allegations of Bolsonaro’s lawyers in the case of the coup plot, according to the column Monica Bergamo.
“Bolsonaro this may have greater or lesser relevance to the investigation. But a conversation that I am cursing your child, saying that you are immature, purely political discussions do not interfere at all in the process,” he says.
He evaluates that part of the material disclosed by the Federal Police may be interested in political or sociological issues. It highlights, however, that Brazilian law prohibits the dissemination of recordings that do not interest as proof.
“The idea of the law was to guarantee privacy, freedom of communication; that only what matters to the inquiry is in the process, what concerns the crime being investigated,” he adds.
