The federal deputy and rapporteur of CPMI (Mixed Parliamentary Commission of Inquiry) INSS (National Institute of Social Security), Alfredo Gaspar (União Brasil-AL), established the main guidelines of the investigation, emphasizing that the focus will be the tracking of public resources involved in possible irregularities.
During his participation in an interview, Gaspar pointed out that “no one has more legitimacy than the Brazilian Parliament to discuss what happens in the nation.”
The rapporteur stressed that the conduct of the work will be based on criteria strictly techniciansbased on proofs presented.
Financial investigation
The main line of investigation, according to Gaspar, will be to follow the trail of public money. “We want to follow the path of money and know where he ended up,” said the rapporteur, demonstrating his commitment to transparency in the calculation of the facts.
CPMI of the INSS comes in a moment of debate on the management of social security resources No country.
The Commission aims to investigate possible irregularities and propose measures to improve the administration of the Institute, which is responsible for the payment of benefits to millions of Brazilians.
Chronology of Investigations
CPMI intends to examine the INSS and Ministry of Social Security management since the government period Dilmapassing the administrations of Michel Temer and including the latest management. The objective is to identify the origin of fraud and determine the responsibilities of both public servants and occupants of political positions.
A series of requirements has already been submitted to the committee, including calls and invitations for testimonials. The president of CPMI plans to perform a careful analysis of these documents to establish priorities in investigations, maintaining focus on technical aspects and avoiding ideological disputes.
Research will seek to understand the functioning of fraud mechanisms in the social security system and identify possible failures in the supervision and control processes throughout different governments. The Commission should also evaluate the level of knowledge and eventual omission of managers who held leadership positions in the agency during the analyzed period.
