Synods and meetings passed,, and participated in the effort to find a common ground nor to find a solution that can be accepted by all sides and now, as demonstrated by both the positions and statements of the directly involved, such as the Foreign Minister of the Foreign Minister, postponed.
US and Russia continue to “flirt” …
Both Lavrov and Vans – in their separate interviews on the NBC – argued on the one hand that the US and Russia want peace in Ukraine and on the other – according to the US Vice President – that Moscow has made significant concessions because of Trump.
In practice, of course, despite the self -evidence and almost to the degree of exaggeration idealization of convergence between the two as it emerges from their statements, Russia has continued its policy of accusing European leaders and Ukraine of not wanting peace, while the US is not involved in the debate on security guarantees.
… Leaving Kyiv and European company with security guarantees
The above are what Lavrov said by answering a question: “We want peace in Ukraine. President Trump wants peace in Ukraine. The reaction to the meeting in Anchorage, the gathering in Washington of these European representatives and what they did after Washington show that they do not want peace. “
Further unfolding the Russian narrative by the Russian Foreign Minister and after actually appearing to “attack” the efforts by Europeans and Ukraine with the US to formulate and decide specific security guarantees, Lavrov put on the table.
The Russian Foreign Minister argued that guarantor forces for Ukraine’s security should be an expanded group of countries that would include the US Security Council member states. In essence, Lavrov argued that Russia, as a permanent member of the UN SA, will be a guarantor of Ukraine’s security after the peace agreement, with which they are almost certain to want to get off at least.
Concerning the US stance on the issue, Jay Di Vance was also clear, stressing that the United States would contribute to whether they are called, but that the biggest part is a matter in Europe, as it is the European countries that are adjacent to Ukraine and the security of the country.
Interestingly, the Russian proposal had been re -formulated, as Lavrov himself said in the 2022 talks in Constantinople shortly after Ukraine’s first attack of the first February attack. The Russian delegation at the time – as it is, now – had proposed a permanent Ukrainian neutral, without nuclear and other… alliances, but security guarantees by the UN SA permanent members and other countries such as Germany and Turkey.
Nevertheless, Vance insisted that Russia has made serious concessions and said as an example: “They have recognized that they will not be able to install a puppet regime in Kiev. This was, of course, an important request at the beginning. And most importantly, they have recognized that there will be some security guarantee for Ukraine’s territorial integrity. “
They take the initiative of moves and to resolve… we see
If you look at the statements of the two, but also other of their interviews, they could form the picture that the US and Russia in Anchorage have not only managed to thaw their relations, but make it clear that the initiative of movements is their own and that in order to have peace in Ukraine, they should be in Ukraine.
Perhaps the only point of convergence between the US and Urkan, which Russia seems to disagree with is that the issues will be resolved if there are short direct talks between Putin and Zelenski. At this point, Jay Di Vance appeared in his interview clearly more … flexible than the Russian Foreign Minister, stressing: “Let the meeting have been made without specifying all the details of the agenda. Sometimes the conversations facilitate understanding the details. ” This ataka was essentially a response to the clear rejection of the idea of a Putin-Zelenski meeting by Lavrov himself in his statements on Friday.
The above shows that a solution for the Ukrainian is still far far away, which is now recognized by the US side, both through earlier statements by Donald Trump himself and through the statements of Jay Di Vanz, who has noted that he has historically been “trading” Other. “
