President of the Slovak Republic Peter Pellegrini next week will adopt the chairman of the Slovak Academy of Sciences (SAS) Martin Venhart in connection with the results of the analysis of vaccines against Covid-19. For TASR, this was confirmed by the President’s office. Venhart asked for a meeting with the head of the state in response to the fact that the government did not deal with the analysis at Wednesday’s meeting.
“Today, the Chairman of the SAS was informed just before the start of the government meeting that the analysis would not be discussed. In accordance with the necessary need to present the results of scientific analysis, Martin Venhart asked the President of the Slovak Republic for admission”Said the spokeswoman of the SAS Monika Tináková for TASR. They confirmed from the President’s office that the President received the application. “He will accept it next week”They told TASR.
According to Prime Minister Robert Fico (Smer-SD), the SAS analysis will not be in the government meeting program next week. He did not want to burden with other topics in Senica Wednesday’s external meeting in Senica. At the same time, he expressed full support for the Government Plenipotentiary for verifying the management of resources during the Pandemic of Petr Kotlar and said he would not allow any pressures to withdraw.
The opposition SaS criticizes that the government did not deal with the SAS analysis even at Wednesday’s exit negotiations. PRedsaa party Branislav Gröhling stressed that the first requirement of the coalition voice-SD was to be the departure of the Government Plenipotentiary to verify the management of resources during the Pandemic of Petr Kotlár. However, the Minister for Voice-SD is more about his places in the government.
“It is a normal government meeting with a program to be discussed. But it is a problem because they don’t know how to do it,” Gröhling said about the missing discussion about the analysis. He is afraid that the document will not be available ultimately. “Of course, it was supposed to be included and at the same time it should have been included that Kotlár would be dismissed from the position of the Plenipotentiary,” Gröhling said at a press conference.
Health Minister Kamil Šaško (Voice-SD) should clearly say that Kotlár has nothing to do in his position. The head of the SaS thinks that the boiler needs a government coalition for its stability, so his position-SD tolerates.
Opposition MP Oskar Dvořák (PS) was similarly critical. He recalled that, according to the Prime Minister, they will dismiss the boiler “only through his corpse”. “He obviously cares less about people’s health than to keep a lucrative spot for his court conspirator,“He said. He pointed out that the purchase of vaccines against new variants of Covid-19 is still blocked for the boiler.
The opposition MP Marek Krajčí (Slovakia, for people, Ú) also questioned the first proceedings. “Robert Fico had the analysis of the SAS scientists for 350,000 euros from people’s money, which he is not interested in now, because it didn’t work out as he wished. Why then did you not order such an analysis that would be cheaper in any accredited laboratory within the European Union? ” asks.
At the same time, the opposition MP Veronika Remišová (Slovakia, for people, CH) also called on Šašek and the Minister of Education Tomáš Drucker (Voice-SD) to publicly condemn the attacks of the Kotlár, but also the MEP for Smer-SD Ľuboš Blaha to scientists from the SAS and were deployed for the dismissal of the Kotlár. If they do not, she should resign.
“I expect the ministers to gain courage and clearly define themselves against the crazy and socially dangerous drift of their political companions. If they are unable and further to tolerate the boiler as a power of attorney, they become co -responsible for continuing moral disintegration of the state and should immediately resign, ”Remišová said in an opinion.
According to the SAS, the analysis showed that vaccines contain only small amounts of DNA molecules, deep below approved values. She pointed out that the risks to which Kotlár pointed out were not proven, and statements and work with claims of high amounts of DNA are based on incorrect procedures and/or poorly interpreted results. She described them as misleading and misleading.
