Senator claims to be “humiliation” with Michelle and Laura; Minister expanded monitoring outside Bolsonaro’s house
The Senator (PL-RJ) called “Illegal and paranoid” The decision of the Minister of the Supreme Court (STF) Alexandre de Moraes to expand monitoring outside the former president’s house (PL).
According to Flávio, the decision “invades the privacy of women in Bolsonaro’s house ” And it’s a “humiliation” For Michelle and the couple’s daughter, Laura.
“He gives more proof that he has no condition of composing the highest court of the Brazilian judiciary. The sequelae of the aloprada de Moraes performance will mark Brazil for a long time”wrote Flávio in his X on Saturday (30.ago.2025).
This is the publication:
Decision of Moraes
Moraes this Saturday (30.ago) does not authorize the entry of police inside Bolsonaro’s house, which in Brasilia since August 4.
The measure had been suggested by the PF (Federal Police) to reinforce surveillance, in the face of risk of escape, but was rejected by the magistrate. Read the decision (PDF – 168 KB).
Instead, the minister determined two external monitoring actions:
- Surveys in all vehicles leaving the residence, including the trunk check, with drivers and passenger registration. Reports must be sent daily to the Supreme Court;
- face -to -face inspection outside the house, especially in the back and sides of the property, where “Blind Points”.
The decision was made after demonstrations of the PGR (Attorney General’s Office) and Seape (Secretariat of Penitentiary Administration of the DF). Both pointed to difficulties in monitoring, ranging from the possibility of technical failures from the electronic anklet to structural limitations of the residence, located in a gated community.
Seape stated that Bolsonaro “It has adjoining properties on both sides and backgrounds, which causes the existence of blind points” and warned that the anklet can be circumvented in situations such as subsoil stay, use of signal blockers or even the call “Envelope” with aluminum foil.
The need for continuous surveillance within the house, but recognized the need to reinforce the control of the external areas and the surroundings of the condominium. “I note that there is no critical security situation inside the house. Apparently, the concern would be girded with the control of the outside area to the house […] Certainly, however, the expectation of privacy must also be considered in these spaces ”wrote the Attorney.
The Federal Police, in turn, had argued that only the presence of agents inside the residence could eliminate the risks of escape, citing precedents such as the case of former Judge Nicolau dos Santos Neto.
