Collegiate has a period of 180 days – about six months – to complete the work and has approved an analysis plan with several requirements, including requests for breach of bank secrecy
That investigates undue discounts on retirement and benefits of carried out on Monday (31) his second hearing. The board has a period of 180 days – about six months – to complete the work and has already approved an analysis plan with various requirements, including requests for breach of bank confidentiality, calling accounting offices, entities and lawyers.
The lawyer heard at this initial phase is appointed as responsible for gathering documents, electronic records and business communications that helped reveal the scope of forged affiliations and illegal retirees. According to parliamentarians, the material raised indicates the irregular use of insured data and the participation of companies and private entities.
According to commentator João Belut, the testimony is important because the lawyer was one of the first to gather a consistent set of evidence. “These complaints had been coming up for some time. Many people noticed discounts they did not recognize, but the investigation would not advance. What is expected is that this CPMI produces a firm report, with robust evidence, and that those responsible are punished,” he said. Belut also pointed out that the scandal may involve not only private sectors, but also servants and public agencies. “A scheme of this size, which involves data fraud and access to bank and confidential information, is certainly multifactorial. The expectation is that there will be real accountability and not just political use of the commission,” he said.
Already the analyst Henrique stressed that the growth of the scheme over the years was only possible with the participation of people within the government. “It is impossible for this type of fraud to occur without direct involvement of those who should oversee. The risk is that, by reaching different parties and political figures, impunity prevails,” he said. The commentators also pointed out that, regardless of CPMI’s outcome, the damage will fall on taxpayers. “We are talking about a fraud against extremely vulnerable people. Punishment must be exemplary so that it is not like another ‘system error’,” concluded Henrique.
