Defendants’ lawyers in the supposed to discard great surprises in what, but they believe it could begin to face one of the most delicate topics of the process: overlapping the crimes of coup and violent abolition of the democratic rule of law.
The assessment is that at least two ministers of the first class, and are receptive to the thesis that the coup, which provides up to 12 years in prison, is the dominant crime and would encompass that of violent abolition, which has a maximum penalty of 8 years.
This in practice would reduce it, as there would be no sum of the two penalties. You bet on a unified penalty of up to 12 years.
With these two votes, it would be possible for lawyers to join, bringing the discussion to the 11 court ministers, where support for this view could be greater.
If the unit thesis between the two crimes prevailed, there would be a ripple effect on many of the defendants, which had high penalties for being convicted of both crimes. It would also be a way for the Supreme Court to signal a certain dystempting after the condemnation of.
Gift Link: Did you like this text? Subscriber can release seven free hits from any link per day. Just click on F Blue below.
