The Riviera project released in the White House for the development of the “Gaza Riviera” revealed the Washington Post. This is the design called Gaza Reconstitution, Economic Acceleration and Transformation Trust (Great Trust).
On Sunday, the Washington Post published an newsletter on the plan, which includes the forced movement of the entire Gaza population of 2 million people, and would put the ground under their guardianship for at least a decade.
On the basis of this plan, they would be encouraged to depart “voluntarily” in another country or in limited, safe zones during rebuilding. Those who hold land would be offered “a digital coupon” from the trust in exchange for the rights of their property, which would be used to finance a new life elsewhere.
Those who remain will be housed in houses with a minimum area of 30 sq.m. – Tiny even for the patterns of many homes that do not belong to refugee camps in Gaza.
It was not clear whether the plan reflects their policy, as neither responded to the Washington Post’s request for comment. However, the newsletter seems to reflect Donald Trump’s previous statement that he wants to “clean” Gaza and reshape it.
US is baptizing the growth of mass expulsion

The Great project provides for a busy port city divided into two parts of a water current and surrounded by up to eight high -tech large -scale artificial intelligence.
The critics of the leaked newsletter was Philip Grant, executive director of the Trial International, a Swiss -based human rights organization, which described the plan as a “mass expulsion plan, which is being promoted as growth”.
“This is a plan for mass deportations, which is promoted as growth. The result? A classic case of international crimes on an incredible scale: violent population movement, demographic engineering and collective punishment, “Grant said.
Trial is one of fifteen groups that have previously warned that private contractors operating in Gaza in cooperation with the Israeli government are in danger of “assisting or complicit crimes under international law, including war crimes, war crimes,
“Those involved in the design and execution of such a plan – including corporate bodies – may face legal responsibilities for the coming decades,” Grant said.
‘Quick enrichment on the basis of war crimes’
Even in the Israeli media, the proposal caused distrust, with a column in the left -wing Haaretz newspaper describing it as “a trump plan for fast enrichment based on war crimes, artificial intelligence and tourism”.
The plan also provides for the creation of an industrial park “Elon Musk” located – without irony – in the ruins of the Erez industrial zone, which was built with an Israeli investment to exploit cheap labor in Palestinian territories and then closed and destroyed by the Israeli.
The map examination seems to suggest that the plan will also include the expropriation of a large part of Gaza’s agricultural land for the creation of an Israeli security belt, which tend to be in the Gaza periphery, near the border with Israel.
As the Guardian estimates, the fine prints of the plan are the most condemning, as they make no distinction on sovereignty between Gaza, Israel and Egypt, suggesting that the Palestinian self -determination has not been taken into account.
According to the plan, Israel will maintain indefinitely defined “general rights” to Gaza “to meet its security needs”. There will be no Palestinian state, but a “Palestinian state” that will join the Israel -Trump agreements.
The whole text of the newsletter, as well as the description of various features, seem to be aimed at satisfying the vanity of Trump, Musk and the Prince of Saudi Arabia Mohammed bin Salman, from which the ring was named around him.
The drawers of the plan were fired
According to the Boston Consulting Group, cited by the Post, the document work was not approved and two senior partners who led the financial planning were fired.
This criticism was repeated by Ha Hellyer, a senior associate of the Royal United Services Institute, who argued that the details of the plan were obviously ridiculous that the proposal should not be taken seriously.
“It’s absurd. What matters is the meaning of the plan, and this is not a new idea: Israel’s determination that there is no Palestinian sovereignty or self -determination in Gaza.
US has made it clear since February [όταν πρωτοεμφανίστηκαν οι λεπτομέρειες του σχεδίου για την κατασκευή του Trump Riviera στη Γάζα] That they have no problem with the idea of ethnic cleansing in Gaza.
” They will be shot or dying of hunger ‘
The idea that this would be a “voluntary departure” when the Palestinians in Gaza have no choice but to shoot or die of hunger. “
Katherine Gallagher, a senior lawyer at the New York Constitutional Rights Center, said that “any company that is allied with Israel – and, it seems, with Trump – in a plan for the forced Palestinian transfer from their homes to Gaza, is exposed to significant legal responsibility”.
Lawsuit to Trump
The CCR recently sued the Trump government for the funding of Gaza Humanitarian Foundation, the private organization that oversees the distribution of assistance to Gaza and the premises of which hundreds of Palestinians have been killed while waiting for food.
The newsletter leaked a few days after Trump’s meeting at the White House to discuss the plan for Gaza after the attack, which was attended by former British Prime Minister Tony Blair, who has contributed to his views on the future of Gaza.
‘Gaza is not for sale’
The draft plan was also rejected by Hamas Bassem Naim’s senior official, who said: “Gaza is not for sale.
Gaza is part of the wider Palestinian homeland. “