The warm tone of NA was consistent with a process in which the main one is already more than decided, the condemnation of and much of its main assistants.
The defenses were the ungrateful task of trying to influence the decision of the ministers at least marginally, and there is creativity left.
The highlight was the performance, worthy of a character from former Navy commander Almir Garnier, with his rapapés to all the authorities he could remember, defense of printed vote and radical preaching of freedom of expression.
The defense, former ABIN director, sought to extir from the lawsuit while the former Justice Minister Anderson Torres used spare reserve slides for the US as alibis to prove a lack of connection with January 8. It is highly unlikely to say the least that the strategies impressed the togades who heard the argument with undisguised boredom.
The sense of play played was exponentialized with the, when the lawyers started talking. He had more to do.
Using only half the time he had available, Gonet made a technical and assertive report to where his discreet personality allows, but at least did not open margin for accusations of being shy with the accused, as occurred in the interrogation phase. The anticipated renewal of another mandate by Lula certainly functioned as biotonic.
In this general climate of meekness, only the minister, because it would be, in her view, equaling audit of the voting system with printed vote. It acted by duty of office as president of the Superior Electoral Court, but at least brought some electricity to the environment.
Ironically, the most difficult task may have been the one who suffers from the most uncertain scenario among the defendants. Their revelations full of comings and goings, after all, tested the patience of the minister and exhausted that of Gonet, who openly speaks of reducing their benefits.
The two lawyers who divided the time of defense left the revelations themselves from Lieutenant Colonel to embark on an openly sentimental appeal strategy about why the deceased military man deserves to have his collaboration recognized.
Exemplary father, brilliant student, artillery instructor, an irregular war expert, official with the UN, the endless list was crowned by a revelation: without psychological conditions to pursue in the army, he asked for a low career to which he dedicated his entire life.
If the benefits are revoked, one of the lawyers said, Jair Pereira, the award -winning institute was over. “Either it is worth it or not,” he added.
The second day of trial will be the turn of some of the most experienced lawyers, who advocate the greatest fish, Jair Bolsonaro and Braga Netto. It is possible that this generates more intense and less anecdotic legal debates, but always within the four lines fixed by Alexandre, who everyone at this point already knows well.
